Cornelius Ernst and anthropology as a preface to theology

Abstract The English Dominican friar Cornelius Ernst OP left an enduring mark on the intellectual life of the English province. Although some of his lectures and articles were published in the volume Multiple Echo , there are a number of different avenues of Cornelius’ work that remain as seeds. Building on Cornelius’ paper ‘A Preface to Theology’, this article investigates the relationship between Cornelius and Edward Evans-Pritchard and Godfrey Lienhardt. Although Evans-Pritchard is most frequently cited in Cornelius’ works, I argue that it is to Godfrey Lienhardt that we should look for the anthropological roots of Cornelius’ ontology of meaning. This paper also interrogates the question of whether there is such a thing as ‘Oxford anthropology’, and whether this has a particular Catholic character. Although I argue that there is no sign of a Catholic anthropology in Oxford, we have to be able to give some account of an anthropologically engaged Catholic theology in the work of Cornelius Ernst. Building on the idea of Cornelius’ work offering seeds for future development, I conclude with a short exploration of how anthropology could act as a preface to theology today, especially in bolstering fundamental theology.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
New Blackfriars
Published
2025-04-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/nbf.2025.25
Primary Topic
Historical Philosophy and Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cornelius Ernst and anthropology as a preface to theology

Albert Robertson
New Blackfriars
Historical Philosophy and Science
article

Cornelius Ernst and anthropology as a preface to theology

Albert Robertson
article en

Abstract

Abstract The English Dominican friar Cornelius Ernst OP left an enduring mark on the intellectual life of the English province. Although some of his lectures and articles were published in the volume Multiple Echo , there are a number of different avenues of Cornelius’ work that remain as seeds. Building on Cornelius’ paper ‘A Preface to Theology’, this article investigates the relationship between Cornelius and Edward Evans-Pritchard and Godfrey Lienhardt. Although Evans-Pritchard is most frequently cited in Cornelius’ works, I argue that it is to Godfrey Lienhardt that we should look for the anthropological roots of Cornelius’ ontology of meaning. This paper also interrogates the question of whether there is such a thing as ‘Oxford anthropology’, and whether this has a particular Catholic character. Although I argue that there is no sign of a Catholic anthropology in Oxford, we have to be able to give some account of an anthropologically engaged Catholic theology in the work of Cornelius Ernst. Building on the idea of Cornelius’ work offering seeds for future development, I conclude with a short exploration of how anthropology could act as a preface to theology today, especially in bolstering fundamental theology.

New BlackfriarsVol. 106(3)
The Priory Hospital (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Historical Philosophy and Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.