Urban-rural economic inequality: is social entrepreneurship the solution?

Purpose “Reduce inequality” is a prominent goal in the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development of the United Nations and holds significant importance in the global policy discourse. Combined with the dual economy theory, this study aims to examine whether social entrepreneurship is the solution to urban-rural economic inequality. Design/methodology/approach This paper uses panel data from 31 provinces in China between 2011 and 2021 and employs a mediation effect model, instrumental variable model and a spatial Durbin model to explore the impact of social entrepreneurship on urban-rural economic inequality. Findings We find that the growth of social entrepreneurship activities correlates with a reduction in economic inequality. Moreover, our results suggest that social entrepreneurship reduces economic inequality by accelerating the process of population urbanization, enhancing non-farm employment and increasing rural income. However, our results reveal that social entrepreneurship has a limited spatial spillover effect. Originality/value Our research extends the existing literature on the reduction of urban-rural economic inequality by introducing the role of social entrepreneurship. The empirical results provide implications to enrich the discussion of urban-rural integration and sustainable development.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
China Agricultural Economic Review
Published
2025-04-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/caer-12-2023-0371
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.52
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Urban-rural economic inequality: is social entrepreneurship the solution?

J. Jean Chen, Sh. H Hu, Di Mao
2 citations
China Agricultural Economic Review
Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
5.52
article

Urban-rural economic inequality: is social entrepreneurship the solution?

J. Jean Chen, Sh. H Hu, Di Mao
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Purpose “Reduce inequality” is a prominent goal in the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development of the United Nations and holds significant importance in the global policy discourse. Combined with the dual economy theory, this study aims to examine whether social entrepreneurship is the solution to urban-rural economic inequality. Design/methodology/approach This paper uses panel data from 31 provinces in China between 2011 and 2021 and employs a mediation effect model, instrumental variable model and a spatial Durbin model to explore the impact of social entrepreneurship on urban-rural economic inequality. Findings We find that the growth of social entrepreneurship activities correlates with a reduction in economic inequality. Moreover, our results suggest that social entrepreneurship reduces economic inequality by accelerating the process of population urbanization, enhancing non-farm employment and increasing rural income. However, our results reveal that social entrepreneurship has a limited spatial spillover effect. Originality/value Our research extends the existing literature on the reduction of urban-rural economic inequality by introducing the role of social entrepreneurship. The empirical results provide implications to enrich the discussion of urban-rural integration and sustainable development.

China Agricultural Economic ReviewVol. 17(4)
Anhui University (CN), Ningbo University of Technology (CN), Zhejiang University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
5.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.