Research Data Governance. The Need for a System of Cross-organisational Responsibility for the Researcher’s Data Domain

The integration of research data management into academic workflows presents significant challenges for researchers, resulting in fragmented responsibility and accountability. This essay delves into the complexities surrounding the research data life cycle, revealing gaps in the existing governance systems. Researchers often encounter obstacles such as missing ethical approvals, inadequate data hosting solutions, and inconsistent data transfer regulations, all of which hinder their progress. These issues stem from a disconnection between the institutional governance structures and the practical needs of individual researchers. Current data policies in academic institutions place an overwhelming responsibility on researchers to manage the entire data life cycle, while leaving support frameworks ambiguous. This lack of coordinated responsibility structures hinders effective data management and governance. To address these challenges, the article proposes the development of a research-centric data governance system. This system aims to bridge the gap between institutional policies and discipline-specific requirements. By implementing a research data governance system, researchers can gain control over data ownership and align it with their research objectives.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Data Science Journal
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2025-012
Primary Topic
Data Quality and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Research Data Governance. The Need for a System of Cross-organisational Responsibility for the Researcher’s Data Domain

Carolin Odebrecht
1 links
Data Science Journal
Data Quality and Management
article

Research Data Governance. The Need for a System of Cross-organisational Responsibility for the Researcher’s Data Domain

Carolin Odebrecht
article en

Abstract

The integration of research data management into academic workflows presents significant challenges for researchers, resulting in fragmented responsibility and accountability. This essay delves into the complexities surrounding the research data life cycle, revealing gaps in the existing governance systems. Researchers often encounter obstacles such as missing ethical approvals, inadequate data hosting solutions, and inconsistent data transfer regulations, all of which hinder their progress. These issues stem from a disconnection between the institutional governance structures and the practical needs of individual researchers. Current data policies in academic institutions place an overwhelming responsibility on researchers to manage the entire data life cycle, while leaving support frameworks ambiguous. This lack of coordinated responsibility structures hinders effective data management and governance. To address these challenges, the article proposes the development of a research-centric data governance system. This system aims to bridge the gap between institutional policies and discipline-specific requirements. By implementing a research data governance system, researchers can gain control over data ownership and align it with their research objectives.

Data Science JournalVol. 24
Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Data Quality and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.