Expert Perspective: How, When, and Why to Potentially Stop Antiresorptive Drugs in Osteoporosis

Osteoporosis is a chronic disease, and antiresorptive treatments are often continued for many years. Despite their established efficacy in reducing fracture risk, the most commonly used antiresorptive treatments, bisphosphonates and denosumab, have short- and long-term risks that, coupled with their benefits and other unique characteristics, influence consideration for at least periodic discontinuation. Bisphosphonates retain their effects even after discontinuation due to their prolonged skeletal retention, whereas denosumab discontinuation is associated with a rapid rebound in bone turnover and increased fracture risk. There is controversy about how, when, and why to potentially stop these agents. We discuss both permanent and temporary discontinuation of long-term treatment with bisphosphonates and denosumab. We focus on the reasons and timing for discontinuation as well as strategies to mitigate future fracture risk.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Arthritis & Rheumatology
Published
2025-04-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/art.43179
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Bone health and treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.18
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Expert Perspective: How, When, and Why to Potentially Stop Antiresorptive Drugs in Osteoporosis

Kenneth G. Saag, Giovanni Adami
4 citations
Arthritis & Rheumatology
Bone health and treatments
4.18
article

Expert Perspective: How, When, and Why to Potentially Stop Antiresorptive Drugs in Osteoporosis

Kenneth G. Saag, Giovanni Adami
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Osteoporosis is a chronic disease, and antiresorptive treatments are often continued for many years. Despite their established efficacy in reducing fracture risk, the most commonly used antiresorptive treatments, bisphosphonates and denosumab, have short- and long-term risks that, coupled with their benefits and other unique characteristics, influence consideration for at least periodic discontinuation. Bisphosphonates retain their effects even after discontinuation due to their prolonged skeletal retention, whereas denosumab discontinuation is associated with a rapid rebound in bone turnover and increased fracture risk. There is controversy about how, when, and why to potentially stop these agents. We discuss both permanent and temporary discontinuation of long-term treatment with bisphosphonates and denosumab. We focus on the reasons and timing for discontinuation as well as strategies to mitigate future fracture risk.

Arthritis & RheumatologyVol. 77(10)
University of Verona (IT), University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Bone health and treatments
4.18
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Expert Perspective: How, When, and Why to Potentially Stop Antiresorptive Drugs in Osteoporosis — Kenneth G. Saag, Giovanni Adami · Arthritis & Rheumatology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS