Breaking trust? International partnership exit and learning about opportunities

This study investigates how exiting key international partnerships affects trust and subsequent learning about opportunities in international markets. We identify three distinct exit approaches using qualitative data from small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). The first approach focuses on contractual exit provisions, which destroy affective trust but maintain cognitive trust as a basis for ongoing learning about opportunities in foreign markets. In the second approach, SMEs exit partnerships by claiming control, thus eroding affective and cognitive trust, turning former partners into adversaries and limiting the ability to learn from new relationships. The third approach, a consensual exit, maintains affective trust, offering future opportunities for market learning. This study advances the understanding of the role of trust in SME internationalisation by identifying the effects of exit approaches on post-exit opportunities through the preservation of residual trust. Crucially, the study reveals that learning about opportunities in foreign markets can endure beyond partnership exit. • The study identifies three partnership exit approaches: contractual exit, claiming control, and consensual exit • Even after exit from a network partnership, trust can facilitate continuous market learning. • Engaging in an acrimonious exit can generate mistrust, affecting future potential partnerships and market learning. • Emotions impact trust, playing an important role in influencing the approach to exit.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Business Review
Published
2025-04-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2025.102451
Citations
1
Primary Topic
International Business and FDI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.23
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Breaking trust? International partnership exit and learning about opportunities

Antje Fiedler, Benjamin Fath, Joanne Wright
1 citations
International Business Review
International Business and FDI
2.23
article

Breaking trust? International partnership exit and learning about opportunities

Antje Fiedler, Benjamin Fath, Joanne Wright
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study investigates how exiting key international partnerships affects trust and subsequent learning about opportunities in international markets. We identify three distinct exit approaches using qualitative data from small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). The first approach focuses on contractual exit provisions, which destroy affective trust but maintain cognitive trust as a basis for ongoing learning about opportunities in foreign markets. In the second approach, SMEs exit partnerships by claiming control, thus eroding affective and cognitive trust, turning former partners into adversaries and limiting the ability to learn from new relationships. The third approach, a consensual exit, maintains affective trust, offering future opportunities for market learning. This study advances the understanding of the role of trust in SME internationalisation by identifying the effects of exit approaches on post-exit opportunities through the preservation of residual trust. Crucially, the study reveals that learning about opportunities in foreign markets can endure beyond partnership exit. • The study identifies three partnership exit approaches: contractual exit, claiming control, and consensual exit • Even after exit from a network partnership, trust can facilitate continuous market learning. • Engaging in an acrimonious exit can generate mistrust, affecting future potential partnerships and market learning. • Emotions impact trust, playing an important role in influencing the approach to exit.

International Business ReviewVol. 34(4)
University of Auckland (NZ)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
International Business and FDI
2.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.