Breaking trust? International partnership exit and learning about opportunities
This study investigates how exiting key international partnerships affects trust and subsequent learning about opportunities in international markets. We identify three distinct exit approaches using qualitative data from small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). The first approach focuses on contractual exit provisions, which destroy affective trust but maintain cognitive trust as a basis for ongoing learning about opportunities in foreign markets. In the second approach, SMEs exit partnerships by claiming control, thus eroding affective and cognitive trust, turning former partners into adversaries and limiting the ability to learn from new relationships. The third approach, a consensual exit, maintains affective trust, offering future opportunities for market learning. This study advances the understanding of the role of trust in SME internationalisation by identifying the effects of exit approaches on post-exit opportunities through the preservation of residual trust. Crucially, the study reveals that learning about opportunities in foreign markets can endure beyond partnership exit. • The study identifies three partnership exit approaches: contractual exit, claiming control, and consensual exit • Even after exit from a network partnership, trust can facilitate continuous market learning. • Engaging in an acrimonious exit can generate mistrust, affecting future potential partnerships and market learning. • Emotions impact trust, playing an important role in influencing the approach to exit.
Authors
- Antje Fiedler (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1004-8505)
- Benjamin Fath (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5651-1649)
- Joanne Wright (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1529-4510)
Institutions
- University of Auckland (NZ)
Publication Details
- Journal
- International Business Review
- Published
- 2025-04-11
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2025.102451
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- International Business and FDI
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 2.23