Interests groups, campaign contributions and political competition

Abstract We study how interest groups affect political competition and policy outcomes. Two parties compete in an election, where each of them can receive support from an interest group in the form of monetary contributions for campaign spending in exchange for a certain position in the political spectrum. The trade-off is that more campaign spending increases the chances of winning the election but the ideology of the interest group is not aligned with that of the voter. We find, among others, that median voter’s welfare decreases the closer the interest groups fundraising abilities are with each other. Thus, the interest group with the most fundraising ability increasing its fundraising ability is beneficial for the median voter.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Choice and Welfare
Published
2025-04-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-025-01593-y
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Political Influence and Corporate Strategies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.45
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Interests groups, campaign contributions and political competition

Javier Rivas
2 citations
Social Choice and Welfare
Political Influence and Corporate Strategies
4.45
article

Interests groups, campaign contributions and political competition

Javier Rivas
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract We study how interest groups affect political competition and policy outcomes. Two parties compete in an election, where each of them can receive support from an interest group in the form of monetary contributions for campaign spending in exchange for a certain position in the political spectrum. The trade-off is that more campaign spending increases the chances of winning the election but the ideology of the interest group is not aligned with that of the voter. We find, among others, that median voter’s welfare decreases the closer the interest groups fundraising abilities are with each other. Thus, the interest group with the most fundraising ability increasing its fundraising ability is beneficial for the median voter.

Social Choice and WelfareVol. 65(4)
University of Bath (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Political Influence and Corporate Strategies
4.45
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.