The thinness of GenAI: body size in relation to the construction of the normate through GenAI image models

Abstract While generative AI (genAI) image models are increasingly popular, they are not without critique for their biased outputs. Building on assessments of Dall-E’s prejudiced and homogenising production of race, this paper seeks to understand how fat bodies are presented compared to straight-size bodies in 649 images created by nine different, free-to-use genAI image models. The images are examined through critical visual analysis and reflexive thematic analysis. In the first instance, auditing highlights that, if not explicitly prompted to show larger bodies, none of the models create fatness or disability. Secondly, in the outputs with a larger body-size prompt, the models produced images which contravened their own content guidelines, showed fewer positive facial expressions, and had higher rates of mistakes and anomalies compared to images without a body-size prompt. This paper argues that the social imaginaries created through genAI images are foreclosing on difference and forming new normate standards of personhood, which explicitly exclude people who exist in socially deviant bodies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AI and Ethics
Published
2025-04-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-025-00684-x
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.87

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The thinness of GenAI: body size in relation to the construction of the normate through GenAI image models

Aisha Sobey
2 citations
AI and Ethics
Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
3.87
article

The thinness of GenAI: body size in relation to the construction of the normate through GenAI image models

Aisha Sobey
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract While generative AI (genAI) image models are increasingly popular, they are not without critique for their biased outputs. Building on assessments of Dall-E’s prejudiced and homogenising production of race, this paper seeks to understand how fat bodies are presented compared to straight-size bodies in 649 images created by nine different, free-to-use genAI image models. The images are examined through critical visual analysis and reflexive thematic analysis. In the first instance, auditing highlights that, if not explicitly prompted to show larger bodies, none of the models create fatness or disability. Secondly, in the outputs with a larger body-size prompt, the models produced images which contravened their own content guidelines, showed fewer positive facial expressions, and had higher rates of mistakes and anomalies compared to images without a body-size prompt. This paper argues that the social imaginaries created through genAI images are foreclosing on difference and forming new normate standards of personhood, which explicitly exclude people who exist in socially deviant bodies.

AI and EthicsVol. 5(4)
University of Cambridge (GB)
Leverhulme Trust, Stiftung Mercator
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
3.87
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.