Practitioner tools for addressing knowing–doing gaps in seed‐based restoration

The increasing impact of global change drivers, including climate change, wildfires, and invasive plant species, is significantly transforming native plant communities in the western United States, prompting a strong focus on ecological restoration. One prominent restoration strategy involves using native seeds. However, achieving successful seed‐based restoration faces several ecological and logistical challenges. Ecological obstacles can include seed predation, unsuccessful germination, and early seedling mortality, while logistical issues can involve ensuring the availability and suitability of seeds for specific sites. To address these challenges, a range of tools, including species selection tools, climate‐adapted seed tools, seed handling resources, trait databases, and restoration information portals, have been developed to assist practitioners. Despite these resources, a significant gap exists between the research produced by scientists and its application by practitioners. Bridging this “knowing–doing” gap requires making information more available, relevant, current, and understandable for end users. Our goal is to highlight online tools that can address the knowing–doing gap in seed‐based restoration to provide a resource for individuals who are interested in: (1) learning about available tools and (2) creating tools for practitioners. Efforts to improve tool usability, provide training, and encourage knowledge exchange are essential to enhancing restoration outcomes and effectively using native seeds to mitigate the effects of global change.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Restoration Ecology
Published
2025-04-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.70043
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Rangeland and Wildlife Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.43
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Practitioner tools for addressing knowing–doing gaps in seed‐based restoration

Danielle B. Johnson, Tara B. B. Bishop, Akasha M. Faist, Magda Garbowski et al.
2 citations
Restoration Ecology
Rangeland and Wildlife Management
3.43
article

Practitioner tools for addressing knowing–doing gaps in seed‐based restoration

Danielle B. Johnson, Tara B. B. Bishop, Akasha M. Faist, Magda Garbowski, Kevin L. Gunnell, Kristina E. Young, Elise S. Gornish, Dirk Neumann, Olga Kildisheva
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The increasing impact of global change drivers, including climate change, wildfires, and invasive plant species, is significantly transforming native plant communities in the western United States, prompting a strong focus on ecological restoration. One prominent restoration strategy involves using native seeds. However, achieving successful seed‐based restoration faces several ecological and logistical challenges. Ecological obstacles can include seed predation, unsuccessful germination, and early seedling mortality, while logistical issues can involve ensuring the availability and suitability of seeds for specific sites. To address these challenges, a range of tools, including species selection tools, climate‐adapted seed tools, seed handling resources, trait databases, and restoration information portals, have been developed to assist practitioners. Despite these resources, a significant gap exists between the research produced by scientists and its application by practitioners. Bridging this “knowing–doing” gap requires making information more available, relevant, current, and understandable for end users. Our goal is to highlight online tools that can address the knowing–doing gap in seed‐based restoration to provide a resource for individuals who are interested in: (1) learning about available tools and (2) creating tools for practitioners. Efforts to improve tool usability, provide training, and encourage knowledge exchange are essential to enhancing restoration outcomes and effectively using native seeds to mitigate the effects of global change.

Restoration EcologyVol. 33(4)
New Mexico State University (US), The Nature Conservancy (US), Agricultural Research Service (US), University of Arizona (US), Utah Valley University (US), Colorado Parks and Wildlife (US), Life Services (United States) (US), University of Montana (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Rangeland and Wildlife Management
3.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.