Exploring the Relationship Between Samples and Masks for Robust Defect Localization

Defect detection aims to detect and localize regions out of the normal distribution. The previous approaches often explicitly incorporate the defect detection concept, such as by utilizing self-supervised ground truth or manually defined feature comparison. The aforementioned processes involve modeling the distribution of normal samples, and they rely on the modeled normality for accurate inference. This reliance may hinder their ability to generalize to unseen test scenarios or the test set that deviates from the training distribution. In this paper, we propose a one-stage framework that detects defective patterns directly without the modeling process. This ability is adopted through the joint efforts of three parties: a generative adversarial network (GAN), a newly proposed scaled pattern loss, and a dynamic correction mechanism that allows the network to self-correct. In training, explicit information that could indicate the position of defects is intentionally excluded to avoid learning any direct mapping. Experimental results show that the proposed method performs superior in comparison with the previous SOTA methods in various test scenarios.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
Published
2025-04-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v39i11.33324
Primary Topic
Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring the Relationship Between Samples and Masks for Robust Defect Localization

Jiang Lin, Hui Xue, Fanxiu Sun, Yaping Yan
Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection
article

Exploring the Relationship Between Samples and Masks for Robust Defect Localization

Jiang Lin, Hui Xue, Fanxiu Sun, Yaping Yan
article en

Abstract

Defect detection aims to detect and localize regions out of the normal distribution. The previous approaches often explicitly incorporate the defect detection concept, such as by utilizing self-supervised ground truth or manually defined feature comparison. The aforementioned processes involve modeling the distribution of normal samples, and they rely on the modeled normality for accurate inference. This reliance may hinder their ability to generalize to unseen test scenarios or the test set that deviates from the training distribution. In this paper, we propose a one-stage framework that detects defective patterns directly without the modeling process. This ability is adopted through the joint efforts of three parties: a generative adversarial network (GAN), a newly proposed scaled pattern loss, and a dynamic correction mechanism that allows the network to self-correct. In training, explicit information that could indicate the position of defects is intentionally excluded to avoid learning any direct mapping. Experimental results show that the proposed method performs superior in comparison with the previous SOTA methods in various test scenarios.

Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial IntelligenceVol. 39(11)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Exploring the Relationship Between Samples and Masks for Robust Defect Localization — Jiang Lin, Hui Xue, et al. · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS