The influence of different roughness metrics on noise discomfort in the aircraft cabin

Acoustic roughness is a psychoacoustic metric frequently employed to characterize the discomfort or unpleasant sensations associated with the fast fluctuation features of noise. Generally, higher roughness values are thought to be associated with increased discomfort. However, contradictory phenomena have also been observed, e.g., the recent study [Huang, Lv, Ni, and Jiang, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 154(4), 1963-1976 (2023)] found that the discomfort was predominantly influenced by loudness and exhibited a negative correlation with roughness for the aircraft cabin noise. To further investigate the influence of roughness metric on noise discomfort, two groups, each comprising 48 participants, rated the discomfort caused by aircraft cabin noise and amplitude-modulated (AM) sounds with modulation frequencies in the 10-140 Hz range, respectively. The discomfort values of aircraft cabin noise exhibit an insignificant correlation with Zwicker roughness metric (r = 0.159, p > 0.05) and a significant negative correlation with Sottek roughness metric (r = -0.640, p < 0.01). By measuring discomfort values of AM sounds, a modulation-frequency-dependent weighting curve was established. The roughness values, adjusted by replacing the weighting curve in the Sottek roughness model, displayed a significant positive correlation with discomfort values (r = 0.713, p < 0.01). This indicated that the modified roughness metric can directly represent the adverse effect of rough characteristics of noise on comfort.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0036434
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Noise Effects and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.12

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The influence of different roughness metrics on noise discomfort in the aircraft cabin

Yu Huang, Weikang Jiang, Xiaoya Li, Ke Ni
1 citations
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
Noise Effects and Management
3.12
article

The influence of different roughness metrics on noise discomfort in the aircraft cabin

Yu Huang, Weikang Jiang, Xiaoya Li, Ke Ni
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Acoustic roughness is a psychoacoustic metric frequently employed to characterize the discomfort or unpleasant sensations associated with the fast fluctuation features of noise. Generally, higher roughness values are thought to be associated with increased discomfort. However, contradictory phenomena have also been observed, e.g., the recent study [Huang, Lv, Ni, and Jiang, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 154(4), 1963-1976 (2023)] found that the discomfort was predominantly influenced by loudness and exhibited a negative correlation with roughness for the aircraft cabin noise. To further investigate the influence of roughness metric on noise discomfort, two groups, each comprising 48 participants, rated the discomfort caused by aircraft cabin noise and amplitude-modulated (AM) sounds with modulation frequencies in the 10-140 Hz range, respectively. The discomfort values of aircraft cabin noise exhibit an insignificant correlation with Zwicker roughness metric (r = 0.159, p > 0.05) and a significant negative correlation with Sottek roughness metric (r = -0.640, p < 0.01). By measuring discomfort values of AM sounds, a modulation-frequency-dependent weighting curve was established. The roughness values, adjusted by replacing the weighting curve in the Sottek roughness model, displayed a significant positive correlation with discomfort values (r = 0.713, p < 0.01). This indicated that the modified roughness metric can directly represent the adverse effect of rough characteristics of noise on comfort.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaVol. 157(4)
Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Noise Effects and Management
3.12
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.