Fair Division with Social Impact

In this paper, we consider the problem of fair division of indivisible goods, where the allocation of goods impacts society. Specifically, we introduce a second valuation function for each agent, which determines the social impact of allocating a good to the agent. Such impact is considered desirable for the society -- the higher, the better. Our goal is to understand how to allocate goods fairly from the agents' perspective while maintaining society as happy as possible. To this end, we measure the impact on society using the utilitarian social welfare, and provide both possibility and impossibility results. Our findings reveal that achieving good approximations, better than linear in the number of agents, is not possible while ensuring fairness to the agents. These impossibility results can be attributed to the fact that agents are completely unconscious of their social impact. Consequently, we explore scenarios where agents are socially aware, by introducing related fairness notions, and demonstrate that an appropriate definition of fairness is compatible with the social objective.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
Published
2025-04-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v39i13.33515
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Political Philosophy and Ethics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.76

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fair Division with Social Impact

Michele Flammini, Giovanna Varricchio, Gianluigi Greco
1 citations
Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
Political Philosophy and Ethics
7.76
article

Fair Division with Social Impact

Michele Flammini, Giovanna Varricchio, Gianluigi Greco
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In this paper, we consider the problem of fair division of indivisible goods, where the allocation of goods impacts society. Specifically, we introduce a second valuation function for each agent, which determines the social impact of allocating a good to the agent. Such impact is considered desirable for the society -- the higher, the better. Our goal is to understand how to allocate goods fairly from the agents' perspective while maintaining society as happy as possible. To this end, we measure the impact on society using the utilitarian social welfare, and provide both possibility and impossibility results. Our findings reveal that achieving good approximations, better than linear in the number of agents, is not possible while ensuring fairness to the agents. These impossibility results can be attributed to the fact that agents are completely unconscious of their social impact. Consequently, we explore scenarios where agents are socially aware, by introducing related fairness notions, and demonstrate that an appropriate definition of fairness is compatible with the social objective.

Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial IntelligenceVol. 39(13)
Gran Sasso Science Institute (IT), University of Calabria (IT)
Istituto Nazionale di Alta Matematica "Francesco Severi", European Commission, Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca, Gruppo Nazionale per il Calcolo Scientifico
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Political Philosophy and Ethics
7.76
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Fair Division with Social Impact — Michele Flammini, Giovanna Varricchio, et al. · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS