Unified inference for longitudinal/functional data quantile dynamic additive models

Abstract We investigate the unified inference of a time‐varying additive model under the quantile regression framework, considering both sparse and dense longitudinal or functional data. For convolution‐type smoothed objective functions, we propose a two‐step method for estimating both the trend and the component functions. Theoretical analysis shows that the two‐step estimators share the same asymptotic distribution as the oracle estimators, while the convergence rates and limiting variance functions differ between sparse and dense situations. However, making a subjective choice between these two cases can lead to incorrect statistical inferences. To address this issue, we develop sandwich formulas for variance estimations. This allows us to establish a unified inference without the need to decide whether the data are sparse or dense. Via simulation studies, we assess the finite‐sample performance of the proposed methods. Finally, analyses of two different types of real data illustrate our proposed methods.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Canadian Journal of Statistics
Published
2025-04-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/cjs.70006
Primary Topic
Statistical Methods and Inference
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unified inference for longitudinal/functional data quantile dynamic additive models

Tao Li, Liwen Zhang, Jinhong You, Qian Huang
Canadian Journal of Statistics
Statistical Methods and Inference
article

Unified inference for longitudinal/functional data quantile dynamic additive models

Tao Li, Liwen Zhang, Jinhong You, Qian Huang
article en

Abstract

Abstract We investigate the unified inference of a time‐varying additive model under the quantile regression framework, considering both sparse and dense longitudinal or functional data. For convolution‐type smoothed objective functions, we propose a two‐step method for estimating both the trend and the component functions. Theoretical analysis shows that the two‐step estimators share the same asymptotic distribution as the oracle estimators, while the convergence rates and limiting variance functions differ between sparse and dense situations. However, making a subjective choice between these two cases can lead to incorrect statistical inferences. To address this issue, we develop sandwich formulas for variance estimations. This allows us to establish a unified inference without the need to decide whether the data are sparse or dense. Via simulation studies, we assess the finite‐sample performance of the proposed methods. Finally, analyses of two different types of real data illustrate our proposed methods.

Canadian Journal of StatisticsVol. 53(3)
Hefei University of Technology (CN), Shanghai University of Finance and Economics (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China, National Office for Philosophy and Social Sciences, Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, Humanities and Social Science Fund of Ministry of Education of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Statistical Methods and Inference
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Unified inference for longitudinal/functional data quantile dynamic additive models — Tao Li, Liwen Zhang, et al. · Canadian Journal of Statistics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS