A Computationally Grounded Framework for Cognitive Attitudes

We introduce a novel language for reasoning about agents' cognitive attitudes of both epistemic and motivational type. We interpret it by means of a computationally grounded semantics using belief bases. Our language includes five types of modal operators for implicit belief, complete attraction, complete repulsion, realistic attraction and realistic repulsion. We give an axiomatization and show that our operators are not mutually expressible and that they can be combined to represent a large variety of psychological concepts including ambivalence, indifference, being motivated, being demotivated and preference. We present a dynamic extension of the language that supports reasoning about the effects of belief change operations. Finally, we provide a succinct formulation of model checking for our languages and a PSPACE model checking algorithm relying on a reduction into TQBF. We present some experimental results for the implemented algorithm on computation time in a concrete example.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
Published
2025-04-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v39i14.33629
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.22

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Computationally Grounded Framework for Cognitive Attitudes

Emiliano Lorini, François Schwarzentruber, Elise Perrotin, Tiago de Lima
1 citations
Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence
1.22
article

A Computationally Grounded Framework for Cognitive Attitudes

Emiliano Lorini, François Schwarzentruber, Elise Perrotin, Tiago de Lima
article en
1 citations

Abstract

We introduce a novel language for reasoning about agents' cognitive attitudes of both epistemic and motivational type. We interpret it by means of a computationally grounded semantics using belief bases. Our language includes five types of modal operators for implicit belief, complete attraction, complete repulsion, realistic attraction and realistic repulsion. We give an axiomatization and show that our operators are not mutually expressible and that they can be combined to represent a large variety of psychological concepts including ambivalence, indifference, being motivated, being demotivated and preference. We present a dynamic extension of the language that supports reasoning about the effects of belief change operations. Finally, we provide a succinct formulation of model checking for our languages and a PSPACE model checking algorithm relying on a reduction into TQBF. We present some experimental results for the implemented algorithm on computation time in a concrete example.

Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial IntelligenceVol. 39(14)
École Normale Supérieure de Lyon (FR), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier (FR), Université Toulouse-I-Capitole (FR), Institut de Recherche en Informatique de Toulouse (FR), Laboratoire de l'Informatique du Parallélisme (FR), Université Toulouse - Jean Jaurès (FR), Institut Polytechnique de Bordeaux (FR), Université d'Artois (FR), National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (JP)
Agence Nationale de la Recherche, Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence
1.22
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.