Comparison of opioid-limiting anesthesia methods in patients undergoing total abdominal hysterectomy

The article reviews the comparison of opioid-limiting anesthesia methods in patients undergoing total abdominal hysterectomy. The aim of the study was to improve the method of anesthesia in the early postoperative period by reducing the dose of opioids, using 100 μg of morphine intrathecally. The quality of the perioperative period was analyzed in terms of inflammation, analgesia and comfort of women. Patients were randomly divided into 4 groups with different anesthesia methods: group I: endotracheal anesthesia – 25 women; group II: endotracheal ane­sthesia + epidural analgesia – 28 women; group III: endotracheal anesthesia + intrathecal morphine – 19 women; group IV: endotracheal ane­sthesia + intrathecal morphine + epidural anesthesia – 19 women. The following results were obtained: Leukocytes after surgery: (17.32 [14.48; 20.11]), (13.65 [11.27; 15.72]), (15.4 [13.4; 18.47]), (15.36 [13.47; 18.4]), which is significantly lower in group II, pI-IV =0.037. The next day: a statistically significant difference is observed between groups I and II-IV, pI-IV =0.047; after 3 days – no significant difference between the groups was detected, pI-IV >0.05. Patients of the first group required intramuscular morphine in 56% of cases, while patients of the second group – 21.4%, patients of the third group – 15.7%, and in the fourth group 0% – a significant difference (pI-IV =0.004). The pain index (M±m) on the visual analog scale after awakening (3.9±0.2); (1.4±0.3), (3.2±0.2); (0.7±0.1) – lower in the second and, especially, the fourth group pI-IV =0.001; after 3 hours – lower in the second and fourth groups, pI-IV =0.01; after 6 – lower in the third and fourth groups, pI-IV = 0.029; further, a sta­tistical difference is observed in the decrease in the scores on the visual analog scale in the third and fourth groups. The time of the first need for analgesia (M±m) in group I was 1.8±0.2 hours, while in group II it was 2.8±0.2 hours, in group 3 it was 2.0±0.2 hours, while in group 4 it was 5.7±0.3 hours, which significantly prolongs the time of the first need for analgesia for group IV, p=0.0001. Therefore, after analyzing the data, we can conclude that the combination of intrathecal morphine and epidural analgesia is optimal for providing effective anesthesia.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Medicni perspektivi
Published
2025-03-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26641/2307-0404.2025.1.325350
Primary Topic
Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of opioid-limiting anesthesia methods in patients undergoing total abdominal hysterectomy

Yuriy Yu. Kobelyatskyy, V.V. Osadcha
Medicni perspektivi
Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
article

Comparison of opioid-limiting anesthesia methods in patients undergoing total abdominal hysterectomy

Yuriy Yu. Kobelyatskyy, V.V. Osadcha
article en

Abstract

The article reviews the comparison of opioid-limiting anesthesia methods in patients undergoing total abdominal hysterectomy. The aim of the study was to improve the method of anesthesia in the early postoperative period by reducing the dose of opioids, using 100 μg of morphine intrathecally. The quality of the perioperative period was analyzed in terms of inflammation, analgesia and comfort of women. Patients were randomly divided into 4 groups with different anesthesia methods: group I: endotracheal anesthesia – 25 women; group II: endotracheal ane­sthesia + epidural analgesia – 28 women; group III: endotracheal anesthesia + intrathecal morphine – 19 women; group IV: endotracheal ane­sthesia + intrathecal morphine + epidural anesthesia – 19 women. The following results were obtained: Leukocytes after surgery: (17.32 [14.48; 20.11]), (13.65 [11.27; 15.72]), (15.4 [13.4; 18.47]), (15.36 [13.47; 18.4]), which is significantly lower in group II, pI-IV =0.037. The next day: a statistically significant difference is observed between groups I and II-IV, pI-IV =0.047; after 3 days – no significant difference between the groups was detected, pI-IV >0.05. Patients of the first group required intramuscular morphine in 56% of cases, while patients of the second group – 21.4%, patients of the third group – 15.7%, and in the fourth group 0% – a significant difference (pI-IV =0.004). The pain index (M±m) on the visual analog scale after awakening (3.9±0.2); (1.4±0.3), (3.2±0.2); (0.7±0.1) – lower in the second and, especially, the fourth group pI-IV =0.001; after 3 hours – lower in the second and fourth groups, pI-IV =0.01; after 6 – lower in the third and fourth groups, pI-IV = 0.029; further, a sta­tistical difference is observed in the decrease in the scores on the visual analog scale in the third and fourth groups. The time of the first need for analgesia (M±m) in group I was 1.8±0.2 hours, while in group II it was 2.8±0.2 hours, in group 3 it was 2.0±0.2 hours, while in group 4 it was 5.7±0.3 hours, which significantly prolongs the time of the first need for analgesia for group IV, p=0.0001. Therefore, after analyzing the data, we can conclude that the combination of intrathecal morphine and epidural analgesia is optimal for providing effective anesthesia.

Medicni perspektiviVol. 30(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.