Tuning-Free Accountable Intervention for LLM Deployment – a Metacognitive Approach

Large Language Models (LLMs) have brought significant advances across various NLP tasks through few-shot or zero-shot prompting, bypassing the need for parameter tuning. However, the "black-box" nature behind their massive parameter sizes increases the "hallucination" concerns, especially in high-stakes applications (e.g., healthcare), where decision mistakes can lead to severe consequences. In contrast, human decision-making relies on complex cognitive processes, such as the ability to sense and adaptively correct mistakes through conceptual understanding. Drawing inspiration from human cognition, we propose an innovative metacognitive approach CLEAR, to equip LLMs with capabilities for self-aware error identification and correction. Our framework constructs concept-specific sparse subnetworks that indicate decision processes. This provides a novel interface for model {intervention} after deployment. The benefits include: (i) at inference time, our metacognitive LLMs can self-consciously identify potential mispredictions with minimum human involvement, (ii) the model can self-correct its errors efficiently without additional tuning, and (iii) the correction procedure is not only self-explanatory but also user-friendly, enhancing model interpretability and accessibility. With these metacognitive features, our approach pioneers a new path toward the trustworthiness of LLMs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
Published
2025-04-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v39i24.34710
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.89
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Tuning-Free Accountable Intervention for LLM Deployment – a Metacognitive Approach

Li Hu, Song Wang, Huan Liu, Zhen Tan et al.
1 citations
Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
0.89
article

Tuning-Free Accountable Intervention for LLM Deployment – a Metacognitive Approach

Li Hu, Song Wang, Huan Liu, Zhen Tan, Jie Peng, Tianlong Chen
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) have brought significant advances across various NLP tasks through few-shot or zero-shot prompting, bypassing the need for parameter tuning. However, the "black-box" nature behind their massive parameter sizes increases the "hallucination" concerns, especially in high-stakes applications (e.g., healthcare), where decision mistakes can lead to severe consequences. In contrast, human decision-making relies on complex cognitive processes, such as the ability to sense and adaptively correct mistakes through conceptual understanding. Drawing inspiration from human cognition, we propose an innovative metacognitive approach CLEAR, to equip LLMs with capabilities for self-aware error identification and correction. Our framework constructs concept-specific sparse subnetworks that indicate decision processes. This provides a novel interface for model {intervention} after deployment. The benefits include: (i) at inference time, our metacognitive LLMs can self-consciously identify potential mispredictions with minimum human involvement, (ii) the model can self-correct its errors efficiently without additional tuning, and (iii) the correction procedure is not only self-explanatory but also user-friendly, enhancing model interpretability and accessibility. With these metacognitive features, our approach pioneers a new path toward the trustworthiness of LLMs.

Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial IntelligenceVol. 39(24)
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), University of Science and Technology of China (CN), Kootenay Association for Science & Technology (CA), University of Virginia (US), Arizona State University (US), King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (SA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
0.89
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.