Can Private Machine Learning Be Fair?

We show that current SOTA methods for privately and fairly training models are unreliable in many practical scenarios. Specifically, we (1) introduce a new type of adversarial attack that seeks to introduce unfairness into private model training, and (2) demonstrate that the use of methods for training on private data that are robust to adversarial attacks often leads to unfair models, regardless of the use of fairness-enhancing training methods. This leads to a dilemma when attempting to train fair models on private data: either (A) we use a robust training method which may introduce unfairness to the model itself, or (B) we train models which are vulnerable to adversarial attacks that introduce unfairness. This paper highlights flaws in robust learning methods when training fair models, yielding a new perspective for the design of robust and private learning systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
Published
2025-04-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v39i19.34216
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Can Private Machine Learning Be Fair?

Filip Svoboda, Joseph Rance
1 citations
Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
3.20
article

Can Private Machine Learning Be Fair?

Filip Svoboda, Joseph Rance
article en
1 citations

Abstract

We show that current SOTA methods for privately and fairly training models are unreliable in many practical scenarios. Specifically, we (1) introduce a new type of adversarial attack that seeks to introduce unfairness into private model training, and (2) demonstrate that the use of methods for training on private data that are robust to adversarial attacks often leads to unfair models, regardless of the use of fairness-enhancing training methods. This leads to a dilemma when attempting to train fair models on private data: either (A) we use a robust training method which may introduce unfairness to the model itself, or (B) we train models which are vulnerable to adversarial attacks that introduce unfairness. This paper highlights flaws in robust learning methods when training fair models, yielding a new perspective for the design of robust and private learning systems.

Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial IntelligenceVol. 39(19)
University of Cambridge (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
3.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.