Lexical Borrowing and Cultural Identity

Abstract Purpose: The general objective of this study was to examine how the use of borrowed words affects or reflects people’s cultural identity. Methodology: The study adopted a desktop research methodology. Desk research refers to secondary data or that which can be collected without fieldwork. Desk research is basically involved in collecting data from existing resources hence it is often considered a low cost technique as compared to field research, as the main cost is involved in executive’s time, telephone charges and directories. Thus, the study relied on already published studies, reports and statistics. Findings: The findings reveal that there exists a contextual and methodological gap relating to lexical borrowing and cultural identity. Preliminary empirical review revealed that lexical borrowing is a key process that reflects the evolving nature of cultural identity in a globalized world. It allows individuals and communities to adapt to external influences while maintaining elements of their indigenous identity. Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: The study recommended that linguistic theory incorporate a more sociocultural perspective on lexical borrowing, acknowledging its role in identity formation. Policymakers were advised to support bilingual or multilingual education, ensuring that language preservation was prioritized alongside the adoption of global lexicons.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Linguistics
Published
2025-04-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47604/ijl.3290
Primary Topic
Linguistics, Language Diversity, and Identity
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Lexical Borrowing and Cultural Identity

Patrick Evans
International Journal of Linguistics
Linguistics, Language Diversity, and Identity
article

Lexical Borrowing and Cultural Identity

Patrick Evans
article en

Abstract

Abstract Purpose: The general objective of this study was to examine how the use of borrowed words affects or reflects people’s cultural identity. Methodology: The study adopted a desktop research methodology. Desk research refers to secondary data or that which can be collected without fieldwork. Desk research is basically involved in collecting data from existing resources hence it is often considered a low cost technique as compared to field research, as the main cost is involved in executive’s time, telephone charges and directories. Thus, the study relied on already published studies, reports and statistics. Findings: The findings reveal that there exists a contextual and methodological gap relating to lexical borrowing and cultural identity. Preliminary empirical review revealed that lexical borrowing is a key process that reflects the evolving nature of cultural identity in a globalized world. It allows individuals and communities to adapt to external influences while maintaining elements of their indigenous identity. Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: The study recommended that linguistic theory incorporate a more sociocultural perspective on lexical borrowing, acknowledging its role in identity formation. Policymakers were advised to support bilingual or multilingual education, ensuring that language preservation was prioritized alongside the adoption of global lexicons.

International Journal of LinguisticsVol. 6(1)
Strathmore University (KE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Linguistics, Language Diversity, and Identity
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.