Navigating Towards Fairness with Data Selection

Machine learning algorithms often struggle to eliminate inherent data biases, particularly those arising from unreliable labels, which poses a significant challenge in ensuring fairness. Existing fairness techniques that address label bias typically involve modifying models and intervening in the training process, but these lack flexibility for large-scale datasets. To address this limitation, we introduce a data selection method designed to efficiently and flexibly mitigate label bias, tailored to more practical needs. Our approach utilizes a zero-shot predictor as a proxy model that simulates training on a clean holdout set. This strategy, supported by peer predictions, ensures the fairness of the proxy model and eliminates the need for an additional holdout set, which is a common requirement in previous methods. Without altering the classifier's architecture, our modality-agnostic method effectively selects appropriate training data and has proven efficient and effective in handling label bias and improving fairness across diverse datasets in experimental evaluations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
Published
2025-04-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v39i21.34422
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.43

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Navigating Towards Fairness with Data Selection

Feng Zhou, Xuhui Fan, Fang Chen, Yixuan Zhang et al.
1 citations
Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research
4.43
article

Navigating Towards Fairness with Data Selection

Feng Zhou, Xuhui Fan, Fang Chen, Yixuan Zhang, Yang Wang, Zhidong Li
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Machine learning algorithms often struggle to eliminate inherent data biases, particularly those arising from unreliable labels, which poses a significant challenge in ensuring fairness. Existing fairness techniques that address label bias typically involve modifying models and intervening in the training process, but these lack flexibility for large-scale datasets. To address this limitation, we introduce a data selection method designed to efficiently and flexibly mitigate label bias, tailored to more practical needs. Our approach utilizes a zero-shot predictor as a proxy model that simulates training on a clean holdout set. This strategy, supported by peer predictions, ensures the fairness of the proxy model and eliminates the need for an additional holdout set, which is a common requirement in previous methods. Without altering the classifier's architecture, our modality-agnostic method effectively selects appropriate training data and has proven efficient and effective in handling label bias and improving fairness across diverse datasets in experimental evaluations.

Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial IntelligenceVol. 39(21)
University of Technology Sydney (AU), Beijing Advanced Sciences and Innovation Center (CN), Renmin University of China (CN), Macquarie University (AU)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Renmin University of China, Ministry of Education, India, Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research
4.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.