My mind to your mind: Christians egocentrically estimate God's and Satan's attitudes

In addition to sources (e.g. scripture) that directly disseminate religious agents' minds (e.g. attitudes), an egocentric model suggests one's own mind may serve as a basis for estimating religious agents' minds. However, the egocentric model is rarely directly tested for inferences of religious agents' minds, and such tests have largely been limited to correlational methodologies, morally charged topics, and to a focus on God or Jesus rather than evil religious agents (e.g. Satan). To expand testing, we conducted two studies with Christians that addressed these limiting factors. In Study 1, correlational evidence supported the egocentric model in how participants estimated both God's and Satan's attitudes on moral topics. In Study 2, experimental evidence supported this conclusion and extended it to both moral and amoral topics: People estimated God's and Satan's attitudes differently as a function of a persuasion manipulation that changed their own knowledge on issues. These findings extend support for an egocentric account of how Christians can infer religious agents' minds.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British Journal of Social Psychology
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12887
Primary Topic
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

My mind to your mind: Christians egocentrically estimate God's and Satan's attitudes

Joshua T. Lambert, Justin N. Wahlers, Danielle E. Wahlers, William E. Hart
British Journal of Social Psychology
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
article

My mind to your mind: Christians egocentrically estimate God's and Satan's attitudes

Joshua T. Lambert, Justin N. Wahlers, Danielle E. Wahlers, William E. Hart
article en

Abstract

In addition to sources (e.g. scripture) that directly disseminate religious agents' minds (e.g. attitudes), an egocentric model suggests one's own mind may serve as a basis for estimating religious agents' minds. However, the egocentric model is rarely directly tested for inferences of religious agents' minds, and such tests have largely been limited to correlational methodologies, morally charged topics, and to a focus on God or Jesus rather than evil religious agents (e.g. Satan). To expand testing, we conducted two studies with Christians that addressed these limiting factors. In Study 1, correlational evidence supported the egocentric model in how participants estimated both God's and Satan's attitudes on moral topics. In Study 2, experimental evidence supported this conclusion and extended it to both moral and amoral topics: People estimated God's and Satan's attitudes differently as a function of a persuasion manipulation that changed their own knowledge on issues. These findings extend support for an egocentric account of how Christians can infer religious agents' minds.

British Journal of Social PsychologyVol. 64(2)
University of Alabama (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

My mind to your mind: Christians egocentrically estimate God's and Satan's attitudes — Joshua T. Lambert, Justin N. Wahlers, et al. · British Journal of Social Psychology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS