Innovative subsurface stratigraphy interpretation by integrating electrical resistivity tomography and borehole data

Subsurface stratigraphy interpretation often relies on sparse borehole data. Due to the inherent spatial variability and limited borehole data, uncertainty inevitably exists in the interpreted subsurface stratigraphy. Geophysical approaches such as electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) provide continuous subsurface data in the concerned cross-section. Though the reliability of the geophysical data derived is much lower than that of the solid borehole data, the continuous subsurface data obtained from geophysical investigations might be taken as a complement to the sparse borehole data in the subsurface stratigraphy interpretation. This paper proposes an innovative subsurface stratigraphy interpretation approach, which takes advantage of the high reliability of sparse borehole data and the abundance of ERT data. This approach is partially developed based on the random field approach recently advanced by the authors, and the relationship between ERT data and borehole stratigraphies is mapped with the algorithm of the support vector machine. The uncertainty of the interpreted subsurface stratigraphy arising from the random selection of the training and testing datasets (for training the mapping relationship between ERT data and stratigraphies) is analyzed by a “ bootstrapping” method. Furthermore, field tests of site investigation at four benchmark stratigraphic cross-sections are conducted, and high-quality ERT and borehole data are collected. Based on the high-quality site investigation data obtained, illustrative applications of the proposed approach are presented.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Canadian Geotechnical Journal
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2024-0575
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
11.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Innovative subsurface stratigraphy interpretation by integrating electrical resistivity tomography and borehole data

Wenping Gong, Ting Xiong, Chao Zhao, C. Hsein Juang et al.
6 citations
Canadian Geotechnical Journal
Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
11.20
article

Innovative subsurface stratigraphy interpretation by integrating electrical resistivity tomography and borehole data

Wenping Gong, Ting Xiong, Chao Zhao, C. Hsein Juang, Fan Li, Lei Wang
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Subsurface stratigraphy interpretation often relies on sparse borehole data. Due to the inherent spatial variability and limited borehole data, uncertainty inevitably exists in the interpreted subsurface stratigraphy. Geophysical approaches such as electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) provide continuous subsurface data in the concerned cross-section. Though the reliability of the geophysical data derived is much lower than that of the solid borehole data, the continuous subsurface data obtained from geophysical investigations might be taken as a complement to the sparse borehole data in the subsurface stratigraphy interpretation. This paper proposes an innovative subsurface stratigraphy interpretation approach, which takes advantage of the high reliability of sparse borehole data and the abundance of ERT data. This approach is partially developed based on the random field approach recently advanced by the authors, and the relationship between ERT data and borehole stratigraphies is mapped with the algorithm of the support vector machine. The uncertainty of the interpreted subsurface stratigraphy arising from the random selection of the training and testing datasets (for training the mapping relationship between ERT data and stratigraphies) is analyzed by a “ bootstrapping” method. Furthermore, field tests of site investigation at four benchmark stratigraphic cross-sections are conducted, and high-quality ERT and borehole data are collected. Based on the high-quality site investigation data obtained, illustrative applications of the proposed approach are presented.

Canadian Geotechnical JournalVol. 62
Xi'an University of Science and Technology (CN), China University of Geosciences (CN), China University of Geosciences (Beijing) (CN), University of Cincinnati (US), Clemson University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
11.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.