Poster Session: Chromatic and luminance contrast adaptation measured using pupillometry and SSVEP

Previous evidence suggests both chromatic and luminance contrast adaptation reduces contrast sensitivity in the post-adaptation period. This effect is chromatically-tuned: adaptation is greatest when the adaptor and probe lie on the same chromatic axis. Previous fMRI data from our lab also suggests S-cone adaptation results in a paradoxical increase in post-stimulus BOLD signal. Here, we use SSVEP and pupillometry to ask whether we can measure physiological correlates of this adaptation. SSVEPs were recorded from V1 using a canonical EEG template (Poncet & Ales, 2023) and pupil diameter was measured using an EyeLink1000 for 21 participants. Stimuli were contrast-reversing chromatic or luminance disks (5Hz, 20° visual angle) presented during a 7s preprobe, 30s adaptation, and 7s probe period. The preprobe and probe were always the same chromaticity at 50% of the adapting contrast. Stimuli were L+M or S-cone isolating with four conditions overall (S/L+M) * (adapt/probe). Both pupils and V1 show an increase in size and response respectively after adaptation, contradicting the idea that adaptation reduces contrast sensitivity. Pupil data showed L+M adaptation increases pupil diameter more for L+M than S probe, with S adaptation having little effect. V1 showed an overall effect of adaptation, but no differences across conditions suggesting that the pupils are more sensitive to chromaticity in adaptation, while cortex shows adaptation independent of chromaticity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Vision
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.25.5.21
Primary Topic
Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Poster Session: Chromatic and luminance contrast adaptation measured using pupillometry and SSVEP

Daniel H. Baker, Antony Bryan Morland, Lauren E. Welbourne, Alex A. Carter et al.
Journal of Vision
Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques
article

Poster Session: Chromatic and luminance contrast adaptation measured using pupillometry and SSVEP

Daniel H. Baker, Antony Bryan Morland, Lauren E. Welbourne, Alex A. Carter, Abbie J. Lawton, Alex R. Wade
article en

Abstract

Previous evidence suggests both chromatic and luminance contrast adaptation reduces contrast sensitivity in the post-adaptation period. This effect is chromatically-tuned: adaptation is greatest when the adaptor and probe lie on the same chromatic axis. Previous fMRI data from our lab also suggests S-cone adaptation results in a paradoxical increase in post-stimulus BOLD signal. Here, we use SSVEP and pupillometry to ask whether we can measure physiological correlates of this adaptation. SSVEPs were recorded from V1 using a canonical EEG template (Poncet & Ales, 2023) and pupil diameter was measured using an EyeLink1000 for 21 participants. Stimuli were contrast-reversing chromatic or luminance disks (5Hz, 20° visual angle) presented during a 7s preprobe, 30s adaptation, and 7s probe period. The preprobe and probe were always the same chromaticity at 50% of the adapting contrast. Stimuli were L+M or S-cone isolating with four conditions overall (S/L+M) * (adapt/probe). Both pupils and V1 show an increase in size and response respectively after adaptation, contradicting the idea that adaptation reduces contrast sensitivity. Pupil data showed L+M adaptation increases pupil diameter more for L+M than S probe, with S adaptation having little effect. V1 showed an overall effect of adaptation, but no differences across conditions suggesting that the pupils are more sensitive to chromaticity in adaptation, while cortex shows adaptation independent of chromaticity.

Journal of VisionVol. 25(5)
University of York (GB)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.