Sand-specific interpretation of state via a modified relative dilatancy index

This paper presents a new, simple strength–dilatancy framework for interpreting the state parameter ( ξ 0 ) in sands using cone penetration test (CPT) data. The approach employs the relative density ( D r ) as a state variable, alongside the mean effective stress ( p′), instead of the traditionally used void ratio ( e). Existing industry-acknowledged CPT– ξ 0 correlations are generally found to be challenged by a stress level bias. This paper argues that stress dependency is often better captured in widely used CPT– D r correlations than in CPT– ξ 0 correlations, suggesting that inferring ξ 0 through correlations with D r may improve in situ interpretations. To facilitate this, a modified parameter ( I Rx ) is introduced, adapted from Bolton’s (1986) relative dilatancy index ( I R ) to ensure compatibility with the widely accepted linear approximation of the critical state line (CSL) in e–log 10 p′ space. The I Rx -based approach is considered applicable for stress levels below approximately 0.5–2.0 MPa, depending on sand type, due to the bilinear nature of the CSL in e–log 10 p′ space. Based on recent laboratory studies, this paper also investigates sand-specific dependencies in the parameters of Bolton’s I R , which share similarities with the parameters of I Rx . This way, I Rx is presented as a parameter useful for stress ranges covering many engineering applications, offering a promising pathway for incorporating sand-specific dependencies into strength–dilatancy relationships and CPT-based state parameter interpretation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Canadian Geotechnical Journal
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2024-0439
Primary Topic
Neural Networks and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sand-specific interpretation of state via a modified relative dilatancy index

M. Jensen
Canadian Geotechnical Journal
Neural Networks and Applications
article

Sand-specific interpretation of state via a modified relative dilatancy index

M. Jensen
article en

Abstract

This paper presents a new, simple strength–dilatancy framework for interpreting the state parameter ( ξ 0 ) in sands using cone penetration test (CPT) data. The approach employs the relative density ( D r ) as a state variable, alongside the mean effective stress ( p′), instead of the traditionally used void ratio ( e). Existing industry-acknowledged CPT– ξ 0 correlations are generally found to be challenged by a stress level bias. This paper argues that stress dependency is often better captured in widely used CPT– D r correlations than in CPT– ξ 0 correlations, suggesting that inferring ξ 0 through correlations with D r may improve in situ interpretations. To facilitate this, a modified parameter ( I Rx ) is introduced, adapted from Bolton’s (1986) relative dilatancy index ( I R ) to ensure compatibility with the widely accepted linear approximation of the critical state line (CSL) in e–log 10 p′ space. The I Rx -based approach is considered applicable for stress levels below approximately 0.5–2.0 MPa, depending on sand type, due to the bilinear nature of the CSL in e–log 10 p′ space. Based on recent laboratory studies, this paper also investigates sand-specific dependencies in the parameters of Bolton’s I R , which share similarities with the parameters of I Rx . This way, I Rx is presented as a parameter useful for stress ranges covering many engineering applications, offering a promising pathway for incorporating sand-specific dependencies into strength–dilatancy relationships and CPT-based state parameter interpretation.

Canadian Geotechnical JournalVol. 62
Grantmakers for Effective Organizations (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Neural Networks and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.