Using Machine Learning to Generate a GISS ModelE Calibrated Physics Ensemble (CPE)

Abstract A neural network (NN) surrogate of the NASA GISS ModelE atmosphere (version E3) is trained on a perturbed parameter ensemble (PPE) spanning 45 physics parameters and 36 outputs. The NN is leveraged in a Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) Bayesian parameter inference framework to generate a second posterior constrained ensemble coined a “calibrated physics ensemble,” or CPE. The CPE members are characterized by diverse parameter combinations and are, by definition, close to top‐of‐atmosphere radiative balance, and must broadly agree with numerous hydrologic, energy cycle and radiative forcing metrics simultaneously. Global observations of numerous cloud, environment, and radiation properties (provided by global satellite products) are crucial for CPE generation. The inference framework explicitly accounts for discrepancies (or biases) in satellite products during CPE generation. We demonstrate that product discrepancies strongly impact calibration of important model parameter settings (e.g., convective plume entrainment rates; fall speed for cloud ice). Structural improvements new to E3 are retained across CPE members (e.g., stratocumulus simulation). Notably, the framework improved the simulation of shallow cumulus and Amazon rainfall while not degrading radiation fields, an upgrade that neither default parameters nor Latin Hypercube parameter searching achieved. Analyses of the initial PPE suggested several parameters were unimportant for output variation. However, many “unimportant” parameters were needed for CPE generation, a result that brings to the forefront how parameter importance should be determined in PPEs. From the CPE, two diverse 45‐dimensional parameter configurations are retained to generate radiatively‐balanced, auto‐tuned atmospheres that were used in two E3 submissions to CMIP6.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2024ms004713
Citations
15
Primary Topic
Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
16.58
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Using Machine Learning to Generate a GISS ModelE Calibrated Physics Ensemble (CPE)

Bithi De, Jingbo Wu, G Cesana, Gavin A. Schmidt et al.
15 citations
Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
16.58
article

Using Machine Learning to Generate a GISS ModelE Calibrated Physics Ensemble (CPE)

Bithi De, Jingbo Wu, G Cesana, Gavin A. Schmidt, Kuniaki Inoue, Ann M. Fridlind, Suzana J. Camargo, Ali Behrangi, Jeffrey D. O. Strong, Gregory S. Elsaesser, Marcus van Lier‐Walqui, Andrew S. Ackerman, Qingyuan Yang, Nicolas M. Leitmann‐Niimi, Maxwell Kelley
article en
15 citations

Abstract

Abstract A neural network (NN) surrogate of the NASA GISS ModelE atmosphere (version E3) is trained on a perturbed parameter ensemble (PPE) spanning 45 physics parameters and 36 outputs. The NN is leveraged in a Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) Bayesian parameter inference framework to generate a second posterior constrained ensemble coined a “calibrated physics ensemble,” or CPE. The CPE members are characterized by diverse parameter combinations and are, by definition, close to top‐of‐atmosphere radiative balance, and must broadly agree with numerous hydrologic, energy cycle and radiative forcing metrics simultaneously. Global observations of numerous cloud, environment, and radiation properties (provided by global satellite products) are crucial for CPE generation. The inference framework explicitly accounts for discrepancies (or biases) in satellite products during CPE generation. We demonstrate that product discrepancies strongly impact calibration of important model parameter settings (e.g., convective plume entrainment rates; fall speed for cloud ice). Structural improvements new to E3 are retained across CPE members (e.g., stratocumulus simulation). Notably, the framework improved the simulation of shallow cumulus and Amazon rainfall while not degrading radiation fields, an upgrade that neither default parameters nor Latin Hypercube parameter searching achieved. Analyses of the initial PPE suggested several parameters were unimportant for output variation. However, many “unimportant” parameters were needed for CPE generation, a result that brings to the forefront how parameter importance should be determined in PPEs. From the CPE, two diverse 45‐dimensional parameter configurations are retained to generate radiatively‐balanced, auto‐tuned atmospheres that were used in two E3 submissions to CMIP6.

Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth SystemsVol. 17(4)
Goddard Institute for Space Studies (US), University of Arizona (US), Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory (US), Earth Island Institute (US), Learning Through an Expanded Arts Program (US), Verisk Analytics (United States) (US), Columbia University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
16.58
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.