The Imposition of Criminal Penalties for Crimes Committed under State of Martial Law: Overview of International Standards

The article investigates the acute problems of imposing criminal penalties for crimes committed under the state of martial law or armed conflicts with regard to the compliance with international standards. Various approaches to strengthening the independence, objectivity and universality of the norms of international criminal law, increasing their compliance with the interests of the entire world community are analyzed. Emphasis is placed on the need to respect guarantees of procedural rights of the defendants even under the state of martial law or in armed conflicts. The protection of the rights of vulnerable groups such as women and children in detention is also addressed. The novelty of the paper is a comprehensive approach to analyzing international legal standards on the application of criminal law measures in armed conflict. Particular attention is paid to expanding the criteria for identifying and documenting the individual characteristics of victims of crime, as well as developing an investigation methodology for the integrated consideration of their personal, physical, social and functional characteristics. This will make it possible to more effectively take into account the specificity of the impact of the here above on certain categories of victims and ensure their full legal protection. The problems of improving the legal protection of individual human rights for the purposes of prevention and punishment of crimes are revealed, gaps in international legislation are studied. The interrelation of individual and group approaches to the qualification of relevant acts is analyzed; the necessity for developing methodological recommendations and possibilities for improving the conceptual and categorical apparatus of international legal acts is grounded. The conclusion is made about the importance of an integrated approach combining the development of conceptual and categorical apparatus, investigative methodology, legal guarantees and mechanisms of interstate interaction to build confidence in international criminal law and increase the effectiveness of its application. The key conclusions of the article may be of interest to scholars and practitioners of international law, criminal law and procedure.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Legal Linguistics
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14258/leglin(2025)3504
Primary Topic
Criminal Law and Evidence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Imposition of Criminal Penalties for Crimes Committed under State of Martial Law: Overview of International Standards

O. V. Maricheva
Legal Linguistics
Criminal Law and Evidence
article

The Imposition of Criminal Penalties for Crimes Committed under State of Martial Law: Overview of International Standards

O. V. Maricheva
article en

Abstract

The article investigates the acute problems of imposing criminal penalties for crimes committed under the state of martial law or armed conflicts with regard to the compliance with international standards. Various approaches to strengthening the independence, objectivity and universality of the norms of international criminal law, increasing their compliance with the interests of the entire world community are analyzed. Emphasis is placed on the need to respect guarantees of procedural rights of the defendants even under the state of martial law or in armed conflicts. The protection of the rights of vulnerable groups such as women and children in detention is also addressed. The novelty of the paper is a comprehensive approach to analyzing international legal standards on the application of criminal law measures in armed conflict. Particular attention is paid to expanding the criteria for identifying and documenting the individual characteristics of victims of crime, as well as developing an investigation methodology for the integrated consideration of their personal, physical, social and functional characteristics. This will make it possible to more effectively take into account the specificity of the impact of the here above on certain categories of victims and ensure their full legal protection. The problems of improving the legal protection of individual human rights for the purposes of prevention and punishment of crimes are revealed, gaps in international legislation are studied. The interrelation of individual and group approaches to the qualification of relevant acts is analyzed; the necessity for developing methodological recommendations and possibilities for improving the conceptual and categorical apparatus of international legal acts is grounded. The conclusion is made about the importance of an integrated approach combining the development of conceptual and categorical apparatus, investigative methodology, legal guarantees and mechanisms of interstate interaction to build confidence in international criminal law and increase the effectiveness of its application. The key conclusions of the article may be of interest to scholars and practitioners of international law, criminal law and procedure.

Legal Linguistics(35 (46))
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Criminal Law and Evidence
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.