Fake news, journalism and the future of the profession: what students in the area think

In the current technological and media context, in which disinformation circulates freely, journalism is accused by various groups of producing untrue or biased information, which affects the credibility of the profession. Within this context, this article aims to understand how journalism students at the State University of Paraíba, in Brazil, understand the profession in terms of its relevance and impartiality. This is an exploratory and descriptive study. Sixty-two students, which corresponds to 13.21% of those enrolled, answered a questionnaire sent electronically in the second semester of 2023. The results show that students understand that there is a crisis of confidence in journalism, aggravated by the power of digital platforms. 82.3% of students consider that there is partial journalism. 90.3% said they came across fake news on some social media platform, with WhatsApp being the application pointed out as the environment in which this type of content circulates the most. 96.8% of respondents said that misinformation can change the outcome of an election. On the positive side, 45.3% of students answered that journalism plays an essential role in the fight against disinformation. However, the survey highlighted a worrying fact: 21% of respondents say that the profession is demotivating. Journalism; Fake News; Desinformation; Journalism Students; Credibility.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Razón y Palabra
Published
2025-04-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26807/rp.v29i122.2204
Primary Topic
Ideological and Political Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fake news, journalism and the future of the profession: what students in the area think

Raul Ramalho, Mafalda Nogueira
Razón y Palabra
Ideological and Political Education
article

Fake news, journalism and the future of the profession: what students in the area think

Raul Ramalho, Mafalda Nogueira
article en

Abstract

In the current technological and media context, in which disinformation circulates freely, journalism is accused by various groups of producing untrue or biased information, which affects the credibility of the profession. Within this context, this article aims to understand how journalism students at the State University of Paraíba, in Brazil, understand the profession in terms of its relevance and impartiality. This is an exploratory and descriptive study. Sixty-two students, which corresponds to 13.21% of those enrolled, answered a questionnaire sent electronically in the second semester of 2023. The results show that students understand that there is a crisis of confidence in journalism, aggravated by the power of digital platforms. 82.3% of students consider that there is partial journalism. 90.3% said they came across fake news on some social media platform, with WhatsApp being the application pointed out as the environment in which this type of content circulates the most. 96.8% of respondents said that misinformation can change the outcome of an election. On the positive side, 45.3% of students answered that journalism plays an essential role in the fight against disinformation. However, the survey highlighted a worrying fact: 21% of respondents say that the profession is demotivating. Journalism; Fake News; Desinformation; Journalism Students; Credibility.

Razón y PalabraVol. 29(122)
Universidade Estadual da Paraíba (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Ideological and Political Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.