“I trust Norway” – Investigating acceptance of shared autonomous shuttles using open and closed questions in short-form street interviews

• This study is among the first to investigate SASs acceptance using open-ended questions. • We found that perceived usefulness, hedonic motivation, trust, and social influence correlate with intentions to use. • Directed content analysis suggests that some could find the social situation deterring. • People seem most concerned with availability, travel cost and safety. • The positive attitudes towards the service seem predicated upon trust in government regulation and proper testing. Shared autonomous shuttles (SASs) could improve the mobility infrastructure in the worlds’ growing cities. This novel service could reduce congestion and improve both mobility and sustainability. To facilitate the implementation of SASs, more research is needed on the psychological aspects of sharing a small, intimate shuttle with strangers. The current study is among the first to use open-ended questions to investigate SAS acceptance. This investigation is based on the Multi-Level Model on Automated Vehicle Acceptance (MAVA). We had 236 participants answer short-form interviews including both open-ended questions and quantitative items. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and correlations, and qualitative data analyzed with directed content analysis. Respondents seem very positive about the proposed new transport service. We found that perceived usefulness, hedonic motivation, trust, and social influence shared large correlations with intentions to use. Other factors such as demographics, technology savviness and use of public transport did not share a linear relationship with intentions to use. Qualitative analysis suggests that, while most people do not mind sharing shuttles with strangers, some could find the social situation deterring. People seem most concerned with availability, effectiveness, travel cost and safety. The reported positive attitudes towards the service seem predicated upon trust in the government regulation and proper testing of the technology, that many think of as immature. Regulation and thorough testing may be paramount in keeping people positive. This study emphasizes the importance of trust and safety to adoption of SAS, while suggesting new factors that need further investigation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives
Published
2025-04-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2025.101414
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.40

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“I trust Norway” – Investigating acceptance of shared autonomous shuttles using open and closed questions in short-form street interviews

Pål Ulleberg, Marjan Hagenzieker, Ole Aasvik
2 citations
Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives
Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
8.40
article

“I trust Norway” – Investigating acceptance of shared autonomous shuttles using open and closed questions in short-form street interviews

Pål Ulleberg, Marjan Hagenzieker, Ole Aasvik
article en
2 citations

Abstract

• This study is among the first to investigate SASs acceptance using open-ended questions. • We found that perceived usefulness, hedonic motivation, trust, and social influence correlate with intentions to use. • Directed content analysis suggests that some could find the social situation deterring. • People seem most concerned with availability, travel cost and safety. • The positive attitudes towards the service seem predicated upon trust in government regulation and proper testing. Shared autonomous shuttles (SASs) could improve the mobility infrastructure in the worlds’ growing cities. This novel service could reduce congestion and improve both mobility and sustainability. To facilitate the implementation of SASs, more research is needed on the psychological aspects of sharing a small, intimate shuttle with strangers. The current study is among the first to use open-ended questions to investigate SAS acceptance. This investigation is based on the Multi-Level Model on Automated Vehicle Acceptance (MAVA). We had 236 participants answer short-form interviews including both open-ended questions and quantitative items. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and correlations, and qualitative data analyzed with directed content analysis. Respondents seem very positive about the proposed new transport service. We found that perceived usefulness, hedonic motivation, trust, and social influence shared large correlations with intentions to use. Other factors such as demographics, technology savviness and use of public transport did not share a linear relationship with intentions to use. Qualitative analysis suggests that, while most people do not mind sharing shuttles with strangers, some could find the social situation deterring. People seem most concerned with availability, effectiveness, travel cost and safety. The reported positive attitudes towards the service seem predicated upon trust in the government regulation and proper testing of the technology, that many think of as immature. Regulation and thorough testing may be paramount in keeping people positive. This study emphasizes the importance of trust and safety to adoption of SAS, while suggesting new factors that need further investigation.

Transportation Research Interdisciplinary PerspectivesVol. 31
University of Oslo (NO), Institute of Transport Economics (NO), Delft University of Technology (NL)
Norges Forskningsråd
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
8.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.