Hermenéutica, phrónesis y argumentación jurídica : una propuesta de reconducción del juicio jurídico desde el pensamiento de H.-G. Gadamer
In this paper we intend to establish some lines of reflection on the problem of the epistemological status of the legal sciences, based on the hermeneutical thought of H.-G. Gadamer, emphasizing the important role of phronesis as a model of hermeneutical exercise, to show how hermeneutics is an instrument for guiding legal argumentation, beyond a merely procedural techne, which has ended up obscuring in a certain sense the humanist vocation of legal knowledge. First, we propose a philological approach to judging and judgment; secondly, we propose a relationship between hermeneutics and phronesis in Gadamer’s thought; Finally, we propose some margins of phronetic hermeneutics to legal argumentation
Authors
- Arturo Mota Rodríguez (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0731-6855)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Estudios filosofía historia letras
- Published
- 2025-01-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.5347/01856383.0152.000314788
- Primary Topic
- Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00