Biological aerosol transmission characteristics and exposure risk assessment in a typical biosafety laboratory

• CFD - simulated bioaerosol in BSL - 2 lab, verified experimentally. • Airflow key to bioaerosol removal, varies by area. • Bioaerosol deposition rates around 70 % at different sources. • BSC front window has risk, but shows good protection. • Infection risk varies with release source locations. Biosecurity issues have attracted widespread global attention. Biosafety laboratories are important sites for medical testing and scientific research. However, there is a high incidence of laboratory-acquired infections due to improper laboratory personnel practices. There is therefore an urgent need to study the exposure risks of laboratory personnel exposed to biosafety laboratories. In this study, Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) was used to simulate biological aerosols generated by improper experimenter handling under three typical scenarios and validated experimentally. The spatial and temporal distribution of biological aerosols was analysed in relation to the flow field and isosurface concentrations. Statistics on deposition rates and contamination levels on different surfaces. Through the flow field of a biological safety cabinet (BSC) and the concentration of biological aerosols within it. Analysed the protective properties of BSCs. Finally, using SARS-CoV-2 as a case study, infection risks in different regions were evaluated. The results show that airflow distribution is a key factor influencing the removal of biological aerosols. No significant difference in biological aerosol deposition rates between release source locations. Nearly 70 per cent of all biological aerosols are deposited on surfaces such as walls, equipment and humans. At the same time a significant portion of the biological aerosols will enter the BSC operating area through the front window opening. This can lead to a potential risk of cross-infection. This study provides guidance for priority disinfection locations in biosafety laboratories and for laboratory personnel to reduce exposure to high-risk areas.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy and Built Environment
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbenv.2025.04.002
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Indoor Air Quality and Microbial Exposure
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.20

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Biological aerosol transmission characteristics and exposure risk assessment in a typical biosafety laboratory

Yao Shi, Rui Rong, Chenxing Hu, Chang‐Jiu Li et al.
1 citations
Energy and Built Environment
Indoor Air Quality and Microbial Exposure
1.20
article

Biological aerosol transmission characteristics and exposure risk assessment in a typical biosafety laboratory

Yao Shi, Rui Rong, Chenxing Hu, Chang‐Jiu Li, Chuang Zhang, Zhijian Liu
article en
1 citations

Abstract

• CFD - simulated bioaerosol in BSL - 2 lab, verified experimentally. • Airflow key to bioaerosol removal, varies by area. • Bioaerosol deposition rates around 70 % at different sources. • BSC front window has risk, but shows good protection. • Infection risk varies with release source locations. Biosecurity issues have attracted widespread global attention. Biosafety laboratories are important sites for medical testing and scientific research. However, there is a high incidence of laboratory-acquired infections due to improper laboratory personnel practices. There is therefore an urgent need to study the exposure risks of laboratory personnel exposed to biosafety laboratories. In this study, Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) was used to simulate biological aerosols generated by improper experimenter handling under three typical scenarios and validated experimentally. The spatial and temporal distribution of biological aerosols was analysed in relation to the flow field and isosurface concentrations. Statistics on deposition rates and contamination levels on different surfaces. Through the flow field of a biological safety cabinet (BSC) and the concentration of biological aerosols within it. Analysed the protective properties of BSCs. Finally, using SARS-CoV-2 as a case study, infection risks in different regions were evaluated. The results show that airflow distribution is a key factor influencing the removal of biological aerosols. No significant difference in biological aerosol deposition rates between release source locations. Nearly 70 per cent of all biological aerosols are deposited on surfaces such as walls, equipment and humans. At the same time a significant portion of the biological aerosols will enter the BSC operating area through the front window opening. This can lead to a potential risk of cross-infection. This study provides guidance for priority disinfection locations in biosafety laboratories and for laboratory personnel to reduce exposure to high-risk areas.

Energy and Built Environment
Beijing Institute of Technology (CN), North China Electric Power University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province, National Key Research and Development Program of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Indoor Air Quality and Microbial Exposure
1.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.