Assessment of the feed additive consisting of Saccharomyces cerevisiae CBS 493.94 (Yea‐Sacc®) for dairy cows, minor dairy ruminant species, cattle for fattening and minor ruminant species for fattening for the renewal of its authorisation (ALL‐TECHNO

Following a request from the European Commission, EFSA was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on the assessment of the application for renewal of authorisation of a preparation of dried cells of <i>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</i> CBS 493.94 (Yea-Sacc®) as a zootechnical additive for dairy cows, minor dairy ruminant species, cattle for fattening and minor ruminant species for fattening. The feed additive is marketed in two solid forms (Yea-Sacc® C and Yea-Sacc® TS) differing by the granulometry. The applicant provided evidence that the additive currently in the market complies with the existing terms of the authorisation. The Panel concluded that the additive remains safe for the target species, consumers and the environment. Regarding the safety for the user, Yea-Sacc® TS is non-irritant to the skin or eyes while Yea-Sacc® C is not irritant to the skin but irritant to the eyes. The additive in both formulations should be considered a skin and respiratory sensitiser and any exposure through skin and respiratory tract is considered a risk. There is no need to assess the efficacy of the additive in the context of the renewal of the authorisation.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
EFSA Journal
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9354
Primary Topic
Agricultural safety and regulations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment of the feed additive consisting of Saccharomyces cerevisiae CBS 493.94 (Yea‐Sacc®) for dairy cows, minor dairy ruminant species, cattle for fattening and minor ruminant species for fattening for the renewal of its authorisation (ALL‐TECHNO

Ilen Röhe, Alena Pechová, Eleftherios Bonos, Henrik Christensen et al.
EFSA Journal
Agricultural safety and regulations
article

Assessment of the feed additive consisting of Saccharomyces cerevisiae CBS 493.94 (Yea‐Sacc®) for dairy cows, minor dairy ruminant species, cattle for fattening and minor ruminant species for fattening for the renewal of its authorisation (ALL‐TECHNO

Ilen Röhe, Alena Pechová, Eleftherios Bonos, Henrik Christensen, Roberto Edoardo Villa, Katerina Theodoridou, Marta López‐Alonso, Francesca Marcon, Ronette Gehring, Carlo Nebbia, Miguel Prieto Maradona, Mojca Durjava, Rosella Brozzi, Maryline Kouba, Boet Glandorf, Giovanna Azimonti, Birgit Dusemund, Montserrat Anguita, Jaume Galobart, Matteo L. Innocenti
article en

Abstract

Following a request from the European Commission, EFSA was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on the assessment of the application for renewal of authorisation of a preparation of dried cells of <i>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</i> CBS 493.94 (Yea-Sacc®) as a zootechnical additive for dairy cows, minor dairy ruminant species, cattle for fattening and minor ruminant species for fattening. The feed additive is marketed in two solid forms (Yea-Sacc® C and Yea-Sacc® TS) differing by the granulometry. The applicant provided evidence that the additive currently in the market complies with the existing terms of the authorisation. The Panel concluded that the additive remains safe for the target species, consumers and the environment. Regarding the safety for the user, Yea-Sacc® TS is non-irritant to the skin or eyes while Yea-Sacc® C is not irritant to the skin but irritant to the eyes. The additive in both formulations should be considered a skin and respiratory sensitiser and any exposure through skin and respiratory tract is considered a risk. There is no need to assess the efficacy of the additive in the context of the renewal of the authorisation.

EFSA JournalVol. 23(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Agricultural safety and regulations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.