Coseismic damage of the 2019 Ridgecrest earthquake consistent with Mohr–Coulomb failure

SUMMARY According to the classical Mohr–Coulomb–Anderson theory, faults form at an angle from the largest regional compressive stress that is approximately 30° for most rocks. However, real settings are more complex and faults often present orientations inconsistent with the angles predicted by the classical theory applied to the present-day regional stress field. The Ridgecrest region hosts a young fault system that is part of the Eastern California Shear Zone, and the 2019 earthquake sequence unveiled orthogonal ruptures at multiple scales, apparently at odds with the classical brittle failure model. We use the Ridgecrest region as a case study and compare surface ruptures that developed during the 2019 earthquake sequence to the expected orientations derived from classical faulting theory and to observations from rock experiments. We focus on the off-fault secondary fractures that developed coseismically at the northern termination of the mainshock fault. We calculate coseismic stress changes from published slip models superimposed to a background stress field. We find that a combination of tectonic regional stresses oriented with the largest compressive stress at N10E–N14E and very weak intensity of coseismic stresses best captures the orientation of off-fault fractures in the classical Mohr–Coulomb–Anderson framework, with an internal rock friction coefficient $\mu =0.6$. The secondary fractures also show a scale separation: long fractures are most compatible with shear failure, while short fractures cluster along the direction of the largest horizontal stress. The latter is compatible with either local normal faulting or early tensile failures that would later coalesce to form longer faults, consistent with growth of shear fractures in laboratory experiments. Finally, the different orientations of fractures that developed during and prior to the 2019 events suggest that the tectonic stress has rotated over geological timescales. When accounting for the specificity of the area, orthogonal faulting is thus compatible with brittle fracturing with typical experimental values of the rock friction coefficient.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geophysical Journal International
Published
2025-04-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggaf066
Primary Topic
earthquake and tectonic studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Coseismic damage of the 2019 Ridgecrest earthquake consistent with Mohr–Coulomb failure

Camilla Cattania, Enrico Milanese
Geophysical Journal International
earthquake and tectonic studies
article

Coseismic damage of the 2019 Ridgecrest earthquake consistent with Mohr–Coulomb failure

Camilla Cattania, Enrico Milanese
article en

Abstract

SUMMARY According to the classical Mohr–Coulomb–Anderson theory, faults form at an angle from the largest regional compressive stress that is approximately 30° for most rocks. However, real settings are more complex and faults often present orientations inconsistent with the angles predicted by the classical theory applied to the present-day regional stress field. The Ridgecrest region hosts a young fault system that is part of the Eastern California Shear Zone, and the 2019 earthquake sequence unveiled orthogonal ruptures at multiple scales, apparently at odds with the classical brittle failure model. We use the Ridgecrest region as a case study and compare surface ruptures that developed during the 2019 earthquake sequence to the expected orientations derived from classical faulting theory and to observations from rock experiments. We focus on the off-fault secondary fractures that developed coseismically at the northern termination of the mainshock fault. We calculate coseismic stress changes from published slip models superimposed to a background stress field. We find that a combination of tectonic regional stresses oriented with the largest compressive stress at N10E–N14E and very weak intensity of coseismic stresses best captures the orientation of off-fault fractures in the classical Mohr–Coulomb–Anderson framework, with an internal rock friction coefficient $\mu =0.6$. The secondary fractures also show a scale separation: long fractures are most compatible with shear failure, while short fractures cluster along the direction of the largest horizontal stress. The latter is compatible with either local normal faulting or early tensile failures that would later coalesce to form longer faults, consistent with growth of shear fractures in laboratory experiments. Finally, the different orientations of fractures that developed during and prior to the 2019 events suggest that the tectonic stress has rotated over geological timescales. When accounting for the specificity of the area, orthogonal faulting is thus compatible with brittle fracturing with typical experimental values of the rock friction coefficient.

Geophysical Journal InternationalVol. 241(3)
Planetary Science Institute (US), Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
National Science Foundation, Southern California Earthquake Center, Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
earthquake and tectonic studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.