International Treaties and European Union Policies on Alternative Methods of Commercial Dispute Settlement: A Comparative Analysis

This article aims to comparatively analyze international treaties and European Union policies relating to alternative dispute resolution (ADR), emphasizing the importance of a harmonized framework to support the effectiveness of ADR.The study is based on a literature review, an analysis of existing legal rulesranging from the New York Convention and other relevant international treaties to EU directives and regulations on ADR in consumer and other areas -and a comparative approach to their implementation in the EU Member States.By highlighting the challenges and opportunities arising from the diversity of rules at international and European level, the article underlines the need for legislative synergy to ensure uniformity in the application of ADR, thus contributing to reducing the burden on national judicial systems and facilitating access to justice for economic actors and civil society..

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Humanities Social Sciences and Education
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.20431/2349-0381.1204004
Primary Topic
International Arbitration and Investment Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

International Treaties and European Union Policies on Alternative Methods of Commercial Dispute Settlement: A Comparative Analysis

Betty Cohen-Tzedec
International Journal of Humanities Social Sciences and Education
International Arbitration and Investment Law
article

International Treaties and European Union Policies on Alternative Methods of Commercial Dispute Settlement: A Comparative Analysis

Betty Cohen-Tzedec
article en

Abstract

This article aims to comparatively analyze international treaties and European Union policies relating to alternative dispute resolution (ADR), emphasizing the importance of a harmonized framework to support the effectiveness of ADR.The study is based on a literature review, an analysis of existing legal rulesranging from the New York Convention and other relevant international treaties to EU directives and regulations on ADR in consumer and other areas -and a comparative approach to their implementation in the EU Member States.By highlighting the challenges and opportunities arising from the diversity of rules at international and European level, the article underlines the need for legislative synergy to ensure uniformity in the application of ADR, thus contributing to reducing the burden on national judicial systems and facilitating access to justice for economic actors and civil society..

International Journal of Humanities Social Sciences and EducationVol. 12(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
International Arbitration and Investment Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.