Possibilities and Limitations of Using Respondent-Driven Sample

Sociological research on hard-to-reach populations (H2R) often faces serious obstacles due to the difficulty of 1) obtaining representative data, 2) reaching the respondents themselves, 3) estimating the sampling error itself due to the lack of quantitative data on the general population. In such cases, the use of traditional methods of respondent recruitment is difficult, since respondents may avoid contact with the researcher. For this reason, researchers use alternative recruitment methods, among which the most popular are the snowball method and the time-location sampling method, since they simplify the procedure for reaching the respondent and build trust between the respondent and the researcher. However, the results obtained using the snowball and time-location sampling methods are often hampered by the difficulty of estimating the response bias due to the lack of procedures for reducing selection bias. In this perspective, the respondent-driven sampling method appears to be an alternative that solves the problem of random selection of respondents, since it is based on the assumptions of 1) the first-order Markov process and 2) the biased chain theory. The article describes the possibilities and limitations associated with a new method of attracting respondents.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
nauka me
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18254/s241328880034144-2
Primary Topic
Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Possibilities and Limitations of Using Respondent-Driven Sample

Aleksandr Frolagin
nauka me
Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
article

Possibilities and Limitations of Using Respondent-Driven Sample

Aleksandr Frolagin
article en

Abstract

Sociological research on hard-to-reach populations (H2R) often faces serious obstacles due to the difficulty of 1) obtaining representative data, 2) reaching the respondents themselves, 3) estimating the sampling error itself due to the lack of quantitative data on the general population. In such cases, the use of traditional methods of respondent recruitment is difficult, since respondents may avoid contact with the researcher. For this reason, researchers use alternative recruitment methods, among which the most popular are the snowball method and the time-location sampling method, since they simplify the procedure for reaching the respondent and build trust between the respondent and the researcher. However, the results obtained using the snowball and time-location sampling methods are often hampered by the difficulty of estimating the response bias due to the lack of procedures for reducing selection bias. In this perspective, the respondent-driven sampling method appears to be an alternative that solves the problem of random selection of respondents, since it is based on the assumptions of 1) the first-order Markov process and 2) the biased chain theory. The article describes the possibilities and limitations associated with a new method of attracting respondents.

nauka me(1)
National Research University Higher School of Economics (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.