Guiding Distinctions of Management and Organisation Research. An Introduction

This article examines the role of guiding distinctions in management and organisation research. Drawing on social systems theory in the tradition of Niklas Luhmann, it highlights how distinctions such as shareholder/stakeholder, purpose/profit, and economy/society/environment not only shape theoretical discourse but also act as pivotal frameworks for addressing empirical challenges. The analysis distinguishes between true and false distinctions and proposes a typology that categorises different types of false distinctions. By engaging with the contributions to this special issue, the study explores the impact false distinction might have for theory development in management and organisation research. The article argues for rethinking guiding distinctions as a means of bridging theoretical stasis and empirical dynamism in the digital era, also offering a research agenda that integrates past, present, and emerging distinctions to foster digitally attuned management and organisational theories.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
management revue
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31083/mrev39357
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Management and Organizational Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.53
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Guiding Distinctions of Management and Organisation Research. An Introduction

Lars Clausen, Steffen Roth, Augusto Sales, Margit Neisig
2 citations
management revue
Management and Organizational Studies
5.53
article

Guiding Distinctions of Management and Organisation Research. An Introduction

Lars Clausen, Steffen Roth, Augusto Sales, Margit Neisig
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This article examines the role of guiding distinctions in management and organisation research. Drawing on social systems theory in the tradition of Niklas Luhmann, it highlights how distinctions such as shareholder/stakeholder, purpose/profit, and economy/society/environment not only shape theoretical discourse but also act as pivotal frameworks for addressing empirical challenges. The analysis distinguishes between true and false distinctions and proposes a typology that categorises different types of false distinctions. By engaging with the contributions to this special issue, the study explores the impact false distinction might have for theory development in management and organisation research. The article argues for rethinking guiding distinctions as a means of bridging theoretical stasis and empirical dynamism in the digital era, also offering a research agenda that integrates past, present, and emerging distinctions to foster digitally attuned management and organisational theories.

management revueVol. 36(1)
Roskilde University (DK), University College Lillebaelt (DK), Kazimieras Simonavičius University (LT), Excelia Business School (FR), Escola Brasileira de Administração Pública e de Empresas, Fundação Getulio Vargas (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Management and Organizational Studies
5.53
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.