Workspaces for entrepreneurs: conceptualizing openness in new workspaces as clopen office provision

Drawing on 40 interviews with owner-managers and eight enterprise hub managers, this study critically assesses the workspace preferences, motivations, and experiences of enterprise hub tenants. This provides a means to evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of four types of entrepreneurial workspaces (home-based, conventional rented office space, enterprise hub, and coworking spaces), which differ in terms of their degree of openness. The paper contributes through an identification of the limitations of binary ‘open or closed’ equals ‘good or bad’ judgements of entrepreneurial workspaces, rather recognizing that the diverse multitasking that is inevitably involved in running a small business means that no single, fixed physical layout is optimal for all tasks. Moreover, the paper contributes to the literature on New Working Spaces, offering practical recommendations for the design of entrepreneurial workspaces, arguing that they should be informed by the ‘clopen’ principle—flexibly combining ‘open’ elements such as coworking spaces, shared kitchens, networking groups and breakout rooms/spaces, with ‘closed’ dedicated space for rent. The paper highlights how enterprise hubs can exemplify the clopen principle in practice, offering entrepreneurs a ‘goldilocks’ optimum combining the advantages of both open and closed workspaces.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cogent Business & Management
Published
2025-04-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2025.2484664
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Facilities and Workplace Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.32
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Workspaces for entrepreneurs: conceptualizing openness in new workspaces as clopen office provision

Ian Merrell, Jeremy Phillipson, Matthew Gorton
3 citations
Cogent Business & Management
Facilities and Workplace Management
7.32
article

Workspaces for entrepreneurs: conceptualizing openness in new workspaces as clopen office provision

Ian Merrell, Jeremy Phillipson, Matthew Gorton
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Drawing on 40 interviews with owner-managers and eight enterprise hub managers, this study critically assesses the workspace preferences, motivations, and experiences of enterprise hub tenants. This provides a means to evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of four types of entrepreneurial workspaces (home-based, conventional rented office space, enterprise hub, and coworking spaces), which differ in terms of their degree of openness. The paper contributes through an identification of the limitations of binary ‘open or closed’ equals ‘good or bad’ judgements of entrepreneurial workspaces, rather recognizing that the diverse multitasking that is inevitably involved in running a small business means that no single, fixed physical layout is optimal for all tasks. Moreover, the paper contributes to the literature on New Working Spaces, offering practical recommendations for the design of entrepreneurial workspaces, arguing that they should be informed by the ‘clopen’ principle—flexibly combining ‘open’ elements such as coworking spaces, shared kitchens, networking groups and breakout rooms/spaces, with ‘closed’ dedicated space for rent. The paper highlights how enterprise hubs can exemplify the clopen principle in practice, offering entrepreneurs a ‘goldilocks’ optimum combining the advantages of both open and closed workspaces.

Cogent Business & ManagementVol. 12(1)
University of Newcastle Australia (AU), Newcastle University (GB)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Facilities and Workplace Management
7.32
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.