Dynamic Volunteer's Dilemma With Procrastinators

ABSTRACT Only one trip planner is needed for a group of friends to enjoy a pleasant trip and only one country is needed to coordinate on international talks that can be beneficial for all participating countries. We study a dynamic volunteering dilemma game in which two players choose to volunteer or wait given there have not been any volunteering actions in the past. The players can be procrastinators and the benefits of volunteering arrive later than the costs. We fully characterize the stationary Markov Strotz‐Pollak equilibria. When the cost of volunteering is sufficiently small or agents' present‐bias parameters are sufficiently close, there always exists an equilibrium in which both players randomize. This equilibrium features stochastic delay, and the delay is exacerbated if one or both agents become more present‐biased. However, if the agents differ significantly in their present‐bias parameters, this difference may act as a 'natural coordination device' and the unique stationary equilibrium predicts that only the less severe procrastinator volunteers, and this may result in an even quicker provision compared with the case of two exponential discounters.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Public Economic Theory
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jpet.70027
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.27
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dynamic Volunteer's Dilemma With Procrastinators

Yixuan Shi
1 citations
Journal of Public Economic Theory
Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
2.27
article

Dynamic Volunteer's Dilemma With Procrastinators

Yixuan Shi
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Only one trip planner is needed for a group of friends to enjoy a pleasant trip and only one country is needed to coordinate on international talks that can be beneficial for all participating countries. We study a dynamic volunteering dilemma game in which two players choose to volunteer or wait given there have not been any volunteering actions in the past. The players can be procrastinators and the benefits of volunteering arrive later than the costs. We fully characterize the stationary Markov Strotz‐Pollak equilibria. When the cost of volunteering is sufficiently small or agents' present‐bias parameters are sufficiently close, there always exists an equilibrium in which both players randomize. This equilibrium features stochastic delay, and the delay is exacerbated if one or both agents become more present‐biased. However, if the agents differ significantly in their present‐bias parameters, this difference may act as a 'natural coordination device' and the unique stationary equilibrium predicts that only the less severe procrastinator volunteers, and this may result in an even quicker provision compared with the case of two exponential discounters.

Journal of Public Economic TheoryVol. 27(2)
Max Planck Institute for Tax Law and Public Finance (DE), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
2.27
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Dynamic Volunteer's Dilemma With Procrastinators — Yixuan Shi · Journal of Public Economic Theory (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS