Institutional Blockholders, Agency Problems and Corporate Debt Maturity

This study examines the effect of institutional blockholders on corporate debt maturity for a sample of 280 French listed firms over the period 2002-2016. Consistent with a demand side story, we find that firm’s debt maturity is negatively related to the level of institutional investor holding, i.e., institutional blockholders use more short-term debt because of their active monitoring role. This result is robust to endogeneity concerns and to several sensitivity tests. Additional analysis shows that this effect is more pronounced in non family-controlled firms and for firms facing higher agency problems such as, high free cash flow, low product market competition and low analyst coverage. We also find that the relation between institutional investors and short term debt is significant only for financially unconstrained firms. Further analysis show that firms with large institutional investors benefit from lower debt costs, ruling out the supply side “reluctant creditor” explanation. Our findings provide significant implications for investors and policy makers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bankers Markets & Investors
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54695/bmi.179.0016
Primary Topic
Corporate Finance and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Institutional Blockholders, Agency Problems and Corporate Debt Maturity

Taher Hamza, Zeineb Barka
Bankers Markets & Investors
Corporate Finance and Governance
article

Institutional Blockholders, Agency Problems and Corporate Debt Maturity

Taher Hamza, Zeineb Barka
article en

Abstract

This study examines the effect of institutional blockholders on corporate debt maturity for a sample of 280 French listed firms over the period 2002-2016. Consistent with a demand side story, we find that firm’s debt maturity is negatively related to the level of institutional investor holding, i.e., institutional blockholders use more short-term debt because of their active monitoring role. This result is robust to endogeneity concerns and to several sensitivity tests. Additional analysis shows that this effect is more pronounced in non family-controlled firms and for firms facing higher agency problems such as, high free cash flow, low product market competition and low analyst coverage. We also find that the relation between institutional investors and short term debt is significant only for financially unconstrained firms. Further analysis show that firms with large institutional investors benefit from lower debt costs, ruling out the supply side “reluctant creditor” explanation. Our findings provide significant implications for investors and policy makers.

Bankers Markets & InvestorsVol. n° 179(4)
University of Carthage (TN), EM Normandie Business School (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Corporate Finance and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.