Child and caregiver language in two different play contexts

This study examined the types of utterances that parents use when speaking to their 36-month-old children (US-based, English-speaking, N = 18) in two tasks: a semi-naturalistic free-play task and a highly structured goal-oriented task, and if utterance type was associated with child talkativeness. Transcripts of parent-child interactions in the two tasks were coded for pragmatic function. Results revealed that parents produced more directives in the structured task compared to the semi-naturalistic task. Within directives, parents produced proportionally more supportive directives that followed their child’s focus of attention in the structured task, and proportionally more intrusive directives intended to shift the child’s focus of attention in the semi-naturalistic task. The more directives parents produced, the fewer conversational turns the child took per second, although this was primarily driven by performance in the structured task. These findings highlight the importance of considering context when studying caregiver language input in interactions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Linguistic Society of America
Published
2025-04-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3765/plsa.v10i1.5880
Primary Topic
EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Child and caregiver language in two different play contexts

Sudha Arunachalam, Emily Brady
Proceedings of the Linguistic Society of America
EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
article

Child and caregiver language in two different play contexts

Sudha Arunachalam, Emily Brady
article en

Abstract

This study examined the types of utterances that parents use when speaking to their 36-month-old children (US-based, English-speaking, N = 18) in two tasks: a semi-naturalistic free-play task and a highly structured goal-oriented task, and if utterance type was associated with child talkativeness. Transcripts of parent-child interactions in the two tasks were coded for pragmatic function. Results revealed that parents produced more directives in the structured task compared to the semi-naturalistic task. Within directives, parents produced proportionally more supportive directives that followed their child’s focus of attention in the structured task, and proportionally more intrusive directives intended to shift the child’s focus of attention in the semi-naturalistic task. The more directives parents produced, the fewer conversational turns the child took per second, although this was primarily driven by performance in the structured task. These findings highlight the importance of considering context when studying caregiver language input in interactions.

Proceedings of the Linguistic Society of AmericaVol. 10(1)
New York University (US)
National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.