Distribution of evidential markers in a Cuzco Quechua corpus

Due to contact, several varieties of Quechua are losing evidential markers. Using a Cuzco Quechua corpus (Macedo et al., 2022), we present the distribution of evidential markers -mi (-n,-ni), -si (-s, -sis), and -chá on discourse connectors (DCs) (Sanchez et. al., 2021) and sentence-level constituents (subject, object, verb, and adverb). To determine how DCs and constituents are marked with evidentiality, we analyze a corpus of semi-structured interviews in Quechua (N=29; 995 utterances total). 3.42% of evidential suffixes were found on DCs and 96.58% on constituents indicating that their syncretic nature (focus and evidentiality) is at play in constituents. A GLMM suggests that evidential type (-mi, -si and -chá) is predictors of DC and constituent marking. -mi is more likely to appear in both syntactic positions, while -si shows the greater shift from DC to constituents (p<0.05). Men are also more likely to mark DCs and less likely to mark constituents.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Linguistic Society of America
Published
2025-04-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3765/plsa.v10i1.5899
Primary Topic
Linguistic Variation and Morphology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Distribution of evidential markers in a Cuzco Quechua corpus

Elena Koulidobrova, Liliana Sánchez, D. Sánchez Pérez, Jefferson Imbaquingo-Ramón
2 links
Proceedings of the Linguistic Society of America
Linguistic Variation and Morphology
article

Distribution of evidential markers in a Cuzco Quechua corpus

Elena Koulidobrova, Liliana Sánchez, D. Sánchez Pérez, Jefferson Imbaquingo-Ramón
article en

Abstract

Due to contact, several varieties of Quechua are losing evidential markers. Using a Cuzco Quechua corpus (Macedo et al., 2022), we present the distribution of evidential markers -mi (-n,-ni), -si (-s, -sis), and -chá on discourse connectors (DCs) (Sanchez et. al., 2021) and sentence-level constituents (subject, object, verb, and adverb). To determine how DCs and constituents are marked with evidentiality, we analyze a corpus of semi-structured interviews in Quechua (N=29; 995 utterances total). 3.42% of evidential suffixes were found on DCs and 96.58% on constituents indicating that their syncretic nature (focus and evidentiality) is at play in constituents. A GLMM suggests that evidential type (-mi, -si and -chá) is predictors of DC and constituent marking. -mi is more likely to appear in both syntactic positions, while -si shows the greater shift from DC to constituents (p<0.05). Men are also more likely to mark DCs and less likely to mark constituents.

Proceedings of the Linguistic Society of AmericaVol. 10(1)
Central Connecticut State University (US), University of Illinois Chicago (US)
National Science Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Linguistic Variation and Morphology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.