Measuring trust in medical research: Perspectives from racial and ethnic communities underrepresented in research
Community feedback highlighted the need to differentiate trust in medical research, researchers, and institutions. While PoRT and TiMR are acceptable instruments for measuring trust in medical research, refinement of both may be beneficial. Development and validation of instruments in multiple languages is needed to assess community trust in research and inform strategies to improve diverse participation in research.
Authors
- Samuel Byiringiro (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9165-0348)
- Joyline Chepkorir (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2273-418X)
- Cheryl Dennison Himmelfarb (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1918-4316)
- Tosin Tomiwa
- Roger S. Clark (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2122-7226)
- Sarah Stevens (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7599-0729)
- Hailey Miller (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6045-6542)
- Mónica Guerrero Vázquez (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4072-3954)
- Leo Valadez
- Foujan Moghimi
- Cassia Lewis-Land
Institutions
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- Johns Hopkins Medicine (US)
- Community Sector Council Newfoundland and Labrador (CA)
- Soil Science Research Unit (FR)
- University of Baltimore (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
- Published
- 2025-01-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1017/cts.2025.40
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Ethics in Clinical Research
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 1.88
Funders
- American Heart Association
- Johns Hopkins University
- National Institutes of Health
- National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences