Consumer preferences for an invasive species as a seafood option – evidence from discrete choice experiments

Abstract Lionfish, as an invasive species, significantly disrupts marine ecosystems. Promoting lionfish as eatable seafood among consumers may effectively reduce the lionfish population, alleviating its impact on marine ecosystems. The primary goal of this article is to assess lionfish’s market potential and determine an effective policy instrument to nudge consumers’ preference for lionfish. Discrete choice experiments are used to elicit consumer preferences for seafood dishes. In addition, we use a split-sample approach to test the effects of providing information about the ecological benefit of eating lionfish. Results indicate that consumer willingness-to-pays for other fish species were substantially higher than that of lionfish, even with the information treatment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agricultural and Resource Economics Review
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/age.2025.16
Primary Topic
Economic and Environmental Valuation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Consumer preferences for an invasive species as a seafood option – evidence from discrete choice experiments

Julian J. Hwang, Zhifeng Gao
Agricultural and Resource Economics Review
Economic and Environmental Valuation
article

Consumer preferences for an invasive species as a seafood option – evidence from discrete choice experiments

Julian J. Hwang, Zhifeng Gao
article en

Abstract

Abstract Lionfish, as an invasive species, significantly disrupts marine ecosystems. Promoting lionfish as eatable seafood among consumers may effectively reduce the lionfish population, alleviating its impact on marine ecosystems. The primary goal of this article is to assess lionfish’s market potential and determine an effective policy instrument to nudge consumers’ preference for lionfish. Discrete choice experiments are used to elicit consumer preferences for seafood dishes. In addition, we use a split-sample approach to test the effects of providing information about the ecological benefit of eating lionfish. Results indicate that consumer willingness-to-pays for other fish species were substantially higher than that of lionfish, even with the information treatment.

Agricultural and Resource Economics ReviewVol. 54(1)
West Virginia University (US), University of Florida (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Economic and Environmental Valuation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Consumer preferences for an invasive species as a seafood option – evidence from discrete choice experiments — Julian J. Hwang, Zhifeng Gao · Agricultural and Resource Economics Review (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS