Elucidating the Dark Side of Personality

Abstract: The D70 inventory was constructed to represent the Dark Factor of Personality ( D). We examined the Norwegian version of the D70 in two studies by looking at internal consistency and factor structure of the full and short versions. We translated D70 and conducted an exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) based on a smaller sample ( N = 295) and then a CFA on a larger sample ( N = 7,142). EFA indicated one general factor explaining most of the variance in the small sample, with eight additional factors, whereas CFA did not converge. CFA in the large sample showed that a bifactor model with five specific factors was better than a one-factor model for the D70. One factor was identified in both short versions, both showed high internal consistency and very high correlations with the full version. We conclude that the Norwegian D70 is consistent with the original version.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Psychological Test Adaptation and Development
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1027/2698-1866/a000096
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Personality Traits and Psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.31
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Elucidating the Dark Side of Personality

Kristin Gustavson, Cato Grønnerød, Morten Moshagen, Linn Kristin Dedekam Øwre
1 citations
Psychological Test Adaptation and Development
Personality Traits and Psychology
2.31
article

Elucidating the Dark Side of Personality

Kristin Gustavson, Cato Grønnerød, Morten Moshagen, Linn Kristin Dedekam Øwre
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract: The D70 inventory was constructed to represent the Dark Factor of Personality ( D). We examined the Norwegian version of the D70 in two studies by looking at internal consistency and factor structure of the full and short versions. We translated D70 and conducted an exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) based on a smaller sample ( N = 295) and then a CFA on a larger sample ( N = 7,142). EFA indicated one general factor explaining most of the variance in the small sample, with eight additional factors, whereas CFA did not converge. CFA in the large sample showed that a bifactor model with five specific factors was better than a one-factor model for the D70. One factor was identified in both short versions, both showed high internal consistency and very high correlations with the full version. We conclude that the Norwegian D70 is consistent with the original version.

Psychological Test Adaptation and DevelopmentVol. 6
Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NO), University of Oslo (NO), Norwegian Armed Forces (NO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Personality Traits and Psychology
2.31
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.