Simple hysterectomy in early-stage cervical cancer: is it the way forward?

Abstract The recently published SHAPE trial demonstrated the non-inferiority of simple hysterectomy compared with its radical counterpart in the management of early-stage, low-risk cervical cancers. Additionally, the study found lower rates of urinary complications and improved sexual health outcomes with simple hysterectomy. There were similar rates of local recurrence with no significant increase in the need for postoperative radiotherapy. Although it may be difficult to depart from a well-established standard of treatment that has demonstrated good results throughout, the results of this trial demonstrate that some patients with low volume and small tumours might benefit from reducing surgical radicality. However, further studies would be necessary before gynaecological oncologists would be willing to sacrifice the greater oncological safety proven by radical hysterectomy and opt for simple hysterectomy instead. The study has its limitations with confounding factors and limited follow-up duration. Nonetheless, it highlights the need to develop new guidelines and recommendations for managing patients with early-stage cervical malignancies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Gynecology and Obstetrics Clinical Medicine
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/gocm-2024-000082
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.06
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Simple hysterectomy in early-stage cervical cancer: is it the way forward?

Rashmi Bagga, Pradip Kumar Saha, Gaurav Khastgir, Anne Monga
1 citations
Gynecology and Obstetrics Clinical Medicine
Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
2.06
article

Simple hysterectomy in early-stage cervical cancer: is it the way forward?

Rashmi Bagga, Pradip Kumar Saha, Gaurav Khastgir, Anne Monga
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract The recently published SHAPE trial demonstrated the non-inferiority of simple hysterectomy compared with its radical counterpart in the management of early-stage, low-risk cervical cancers. Additionally, the study found lower rates of urinary complications and improved sexual health outcomes with simple hysterectomy. There were similar rates of local recurrence with no significant increase in the need for postoperative radiotherapy. Although it may be difficult to depart from a well-established standard of treatment that has demonstrated good results throughout, the results of this trial demonstrate that some patients with low volume and small tumours might benefit from reducing surgical radicality. However, further studies would be necessary before gynaecological oncologists would be willing to sacrifice the greater oncological safety proven by radical hysterectomy and opt for simple hysterectomy instead. The study has its limitations with confounding factors and limited follow-up duration. Nonetheless, it highlights the need to develop new guidelines and recommendations for managing patients with early-stage cervical malignancies.

Gynecology and Obstetrics Clinical MedicineVol. 5(2)
Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
2.06
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.