Safety and efficacy of a feed additive consisting of capsaicin for all animal species (XP Chemistries AB)

Following a request from the European Commission, EFSA was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on the safety and efficacy of capsaicin as a sensory feed additive for all animal species (flavouring compounds). The additive is specified to have a purity of at least 98% with a ratio of <i>(E)-</i>capsaicin (<i>trans</i>-capsaicin) to <i>(Z)-</i>capsaicin (<i>cis-</i>capsaicin) of ≥ 6:1. The FEEDAP Panel concludes that the additive capsaicin is safe at the recommended maximum use level proposed by the applicant (6.5 mg/kg complete feed) for use in all poultry species, all porcine species, all bovines, ovines, caprines, cervids and camelids, all equids, leporids, salmonids and minor fin fish species, dogs, ornamental birds and ornamental fish. For cats and other species not considered above, 5.3 mg/kg complete feed is considered safe. The use of capsaicin as a feed additive is considered safe for consumers and the environment. Capsaicin is a skin and respiratory irritant and is assumed to be an eye irritant. It is not a dermal sensitiser. Any exposure of users is considered a risk. The Panel concluded that the additive has the potential to be efficacious as a flavouring additive in feed for all animal species under the proposed conditions of use.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
EFSA Journal
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9340
Primary Topic
Agricultural safety and regulations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Safety and efficacy of a feed additive consisting of capsaicin for all animal species (XP Chemistries AB)

Ilen Röhe, Paul Brantom, Maria de Lourdes Bastos, Alena Pechová et al.
1 links
EFSA Journal
Agricultural safety and regulations
article

Safety and efficacy of a feed additive consisting of capsaicin for all animal species (XP Chemistries AB)

Ilen Röhe, Paul Brantom, Maria de Lourdes Bastos, Alena Pechová, Eleftherios Bonos, Henrik Christensen, Roberto Edoardo Villa, Paola Manini, Andrew Chesson, Katerina Theodoridou, Marta López‐Alonso, Francesca Marcon, Ronette Gehring, Carlo Nebbia, Miguel Prieto Maradona, Mojca Durjava, Maryline Kouba, Boet Glandorf, Giovanna Azimonti, Birgit Dusemund, Jaume Galobart, Maria Vittoria Vettori, Fabiola Pizzo, Jürgen Gropp, Ruud Woutersen, Georges Bories
article en

Abstract

Following a request from the European Commission, EFSA was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on the safety and efficacy of capsaicin as a sensory feed additive for all animal species (flavouring compounds). The additive is specified to have a purity of at least 98% with a ratio of <i>(E)-</i>capsaicin (<i>trans</i>-capsaicin) to <i>(Z)-</i>capsaicin (<i>cis-</i>capsaicin) of ≥ 6:1. The FEEDAP Panel concludes that the additive capsaicin is safe at the recommended maximum use level proposed by the applicant (6.5 mg/kg complete feed) for use in all poultry species, all porcine species, all bovines, ovines, caprines, cervids and camelids, all equids, leporids, salmonids and minor fin fish species, dogs, ornamental birds and ornamental fish. For cats and other species not considered above, 5.3 mg/kg complete feed is considered safe. The use of capsaicin as a feed additive is considered safe for consumers and the environment. Capsaicin is a skin and respiratory irritant and is assumed to be an eye irritant. It is not a dermal sensitiser. Any exposure of users is considered a risk. The Panel concluded that the additive has the potential to be efficacious as a flavouring additive in feed for all animal species under the proposed conditions of use.

EFSA JournalVol. 23(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Agricultural safety and regulations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.