Clinical sustainability assessment of sepsis care bundle: a cross-sectional study

Abstract Introduction Clinical sustainability in healthcare ensures long-term delivery of high-quality care. A ‘care bundle’ is a set of interventions specifically designed for managing a particular condition, differing from standard care checklists by comprising evidence-based best practices. Care bundles like sepsis management are essential for improving patient outcomes and hospital accreditation processes. We assessed the clinical sustainability of sepsis care bundle use in practice. Methods The study conducted in a single department at a tertiary public hospital in Oman utilized the clinical sustainability assessment tool (C-SAT). This cross-sectional study involved healthcare professionals at Royal Hospital, Oman, using the C-SAT to evaluate sepsis care bundle sustainability. Data were collected via a digital survey between June and October 2023. Descriptive statistics summarized demographic characteristics and domain scores. Internal consistency was assessed with Cronbach’s alpha, and multivariable regression analysed the impact of profession on sustainability scores. Results A total of 121 (n = 245) healthcare professionals participated in the survey (49% response rate), including 97 nurses (80%) and 24 physicians (19%). Gender distribution showed 86% female and 14% male respondents. Nurses had more experience (12 years) compared to physicians (8 years). Cronbach’s alpha indicated strong internal consistency across various domains, with values ranging from 0.9117 to 0.9541. Clinical sustainability scores for sepsis bundles showed no significant variation between nurses and physicians. Multivariable regression analysis revealed that nurses had significantly lower scores in Engaged Staff & Leadership compared to physicians (mean difference: −4.16, P = 0.014). Conclusions The study findings emphasize the impact of various factors, such as workload and organizational structure, on sustainability perceptions, highlighting the need for targeted interventions to enhance collaboration and sustainability in sepsis care bundle delivery.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IJQHC Communications
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ijcoms/lyaf003
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.26
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical sustainability assessment of sepsis care bundle: a cross-sectional study

Samiha Al Habsi, Salah Thabit Al Awaidy, Fatma Al Fahdi, Thuraiya Al Harthi et al.
2 citations
IJQHC Communications
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
6.26
article

Clinical sustainability assessment of sepsis care bundle: a cross-sectional study

Samiha Al Habsi, Salah Thabit Al Awaidy, Fatma Al Fahdi, Thuraiya Al Harthi, Jehan Al Fannah, Hiba Al Naabi
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Clinical sustainability in healthcare ensures long-term delivery of high-quality care. A ‘care bundle’ is a set of interventions specifically designed for managing a particular condition, differing from standard care checklists by comprising evidence-based best practices. Care bundles like sepsis management are essential for improving patient outcomes and hospital accreditation processes. We assessed the clinical sustainability of sepsis care bundle use in practice. Methods The study conducted in a single department at a tertiary public hospital in Oman utilized the clinical sustainability assessment tool (C-SAT). This cross-sectional study involved healthcare professionals at Royal Hospital, Oman, using the C-SAT to evaluate sepsis care bundle sustainability. Data were collected via a digital survey between June and October 2023. Descriptive statistics summarized demographic characteristics and domain scores. Internal consistency was assessed with Cronbach’s alpha, and multivariable regression analysed the impact of profession on sustainability scores. Results A total of 121 (n = 245) healthcare professionals participated in the survey (49% response rate), including 97 nurses (80%) and 24 physicians (19%). Gender distribution showed 86% female and 14% male respondents. Nurses had more experience (12 years) compared to physicians (8 years). Cronbach’s alpha indicated strong internal consistency across various domains, with values ranging from 0.9117 to 0.9541. Clinical sustainability scores for sepsis bundles showed no significant variation between nurses and physicians. Multivariable regression analysis revealed that nurses had significantly lower scores in Engaged Staff & Leadership compared to physicians (mean difference: −4.16, P = 0.014). Conclusions The study findings emphasize the impact of various factors, such as workload and organizational structure, on sustainability perceptions, highlighting the need for targeted interventions to enhance collaboration and sustainability in sepsis care bundle delivery.

IJQHC CommunicationsVol. 5(1)
Health Affairs (US), Royal Hospital (OM), National Patient Safety Foundation (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
6.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.