Financing food environments: who has the power to drive healthier food investment in Australia?

This article explores the intersection of financialization and the commercial determinants of health (CDoH), with a focus on Australian food systems. While existing research highlights the food industry's role in shaping dietary patterns and health outcomes, the financial sector's influence on food systems governance remains underexamined. By investigating key actors in food systems investment policy and practice and the types of power they wield, this study contributes to a growing body of literature on CDoH. We conducted 22 semi-structured interviews with financial (e.g. investment banks and assets managers) and non-financial (e.g. food industry, government, and civil society) actors in Australia. Applying Moon's expanded power typology, we examined how financial and non-financial actors influence food systems investment, the disruptive potential of the financial sector on established power dynamics, and implications for the healthfulness of food environments. Our results identified economic power as the foundation of influence, but network and expert power were seen as critical, especially for financial actors to get deals done. Financial actors, including the 'responsible investment' sector, were perceived as potentially disrupting traditional power dynamics dominated by transnational food companies. Financial norms and practices manifested differently among different actors and areas of food systems. Governments were viewed as largely absent, with calls for them to articulate a clear investment policy vision to guide healthier food systems. This study provides novel insights into financial sector involvement in food systems, the disruption of traditional power dynamics, and opportunities for healthier food systems while also raising risks for increased market concentration through financialization.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Health Promotion International
Published
2025-03-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daaf032
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.76

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Financing food environments: who has the power to drive healthier food investment in Australia?

Sirinya Phulkerd, Sharon Friel, Jeff Collin, Anne Marie Thow et al.
1 citations
Health Promotion International
Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
2.76
article

Financing food environments: who has the power to drive healthier food investment in Australia?

Sirinya Phulkerd, Sharon Friel, Jeff Collin, Anne Marie Thow, Ashley Schram, Carmen Huckel Schneider
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This article explores the intersection of financialization and the commercial determinants of health (CDoH), with a focus on Australian food systems. While existing research highlights the food industry's role in shaping dietary patterns and health outcomes, the financial sector's influence on food systems governance remains underexamined. By investigating key actors in food systems investment policy and practice and the types of power they wield, this study contributes to a growing body of literature on CDoH. We conducted 22 semi-structured interviews with financial (e.g. investment banks and assets managers) and non-financial (e.g. food industry, government, and civil society) actors in Australia. Applying Moon's expanded power typology, we examined how financial and non-financial actors influence food systems investment, the disruptive potential of the financial sector on established power dynamics, and implications for the healthfulness of food environments. Our results identified economic power as the foundation of influence, but network and expert power were seen as critical, especially for financial actors to get deals done. Financial actors, including the 'responsible investment' sector, were perceived as potentially disrupting traditional power dynamics dominated by transnational food companies. Financial norms and practices manifested differently among different actors and areas of food systems. Governments were viewed as largely absent, with calls for them to articulate a clear investment policy vision to guide healthier food systems. This study provides novel insights into financial sector involvement in food systems, the disruption of traditional power dynamics, and opportunities for healthier food systems while also raising risks for increased market concentration through financialization.

Health Promotion InternationalVol. 40(2)
Australian National University (AU), The University of Sydney (AU), Mahidol University (TH), University of Edinburgh (GB)
Australian Research Council
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
2.76
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.