Connecting Policy Learning and Policy Conflicts: A Case Study of Water Management in Colorado

ABSTRACT Disagreements and conflicts over public policy can create opportunities for people to learn about how others value and prioritize policy issues or what types of policy alternatives are feasible in the face of conflicting goals. Such learning can have feedback effects that either mitigate or enhance conflicts. Despite the logical intersections between policy conflict and learning, limited empirical attention has been paid to understanding their dynamics. To address this limitation, this paper employs the Policy Conflict Framework as a guide to analyzing learning in the context of policy conflicts. To examine the relationship between policy conflict and learning, we use interview data from policy actors involved in water management conflicts in Colorado. We find empirical evidence that the intersection between policy conflict and learning is dynamic and multifaceted. First, learning is not simply an outcome of conflict; it can be an intentional conflict mitigation strategy. Second, understanding the differences between types of learning can help inform how conflict intensity is fueled or contained. We also find that several characteristics of the policy conflict settings can support learning processes that can mitigate conflicts. These include collaborative venues with resources, trusting relationships, and influential actors, and conflict issues consequential to diverse interests. The findings inform both policy conflict and learning literature by empirically assessing the factors that enable learning in the face of policy conflict. Related Articles Butz, A. M., M. P. Fix, and J. L. Mitchell. 2015. “Policy Learning and the Diffusion of Stand‐Your‐Ground Laws.” Politics & Policy 43, no. 3: 347–377. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12116 . Anderson, D., L. A. Lawhon, J. Berggren, J. Huda, E. Koebele, and A. Kroepsch. 2017. “A Narrative Policy Framework Analysis of Wildfire Policy Discussions in Two Colorado Communities.” Politics & Policy 45, no. 4: 626–656. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12207 . Shanahan, E. A., M. K. McBeth, and P. L. Hathaway. 2011. “Narrative Policy Framework: The Influence of Media Policy Narratives on Public Opinion.” Politics & Policy 39: 373–400. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1747‐1346.2011.00295.x/abstract .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Politics &amp Policy
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.70024
Primary Topic
Policy Transfer and Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Connecting Policy Learning and Policy Conflicts: A Case Study of Water Management in Colorado

Tanya Heikkila, Deserai A. Crow, B.J. Smith, Emma Scheetz
Politics &amp Policy
Policy Transfer and Learning
article

Connecting Policy Learning and Policy Conflicts: A Case Study of Water Management in Colorado

Tanya Heikkila, Deserai A. Crow, B.J. Smith, Emma Scheetz
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Disagreements and conflicts over public policy can create opportunities for people to learn about how others value and prioritize policy issues or what types of policy alternatives are feasible in the face of conflicting goals. Such learning can have feedback effects that either mitigate or enhance conflicts. Despite the logical intersections between policy conflict and learning, limited empirical attention has been paid to understanding their dynamics. To address this limitation, this paper employs the Policy Conflict Framework as a guide to analyzing learning in the context of policy conflicts. To examine the relationship between policy conflict and learning, we use interview data from policy actors involved in water management conflicts in Colorado. We find empirical evidence that the intersection between policy conflict and learning is dynamic and multifaceted. First, learning is not simply an outcome of conflict; it can be an intentional conflict mitigation strategy. Second, understanding the differences between types of learning can help inform how conflict intensity is fueled or contained. We also find that several characteristics of the policy conflict settings can support learning processes that can mitigate conflicts. These include collaborative venues with resources, trusting relationships, and influential actors, and conflict issues consequential to diverse interests. The findings inform both policy conflict and learning literature by empirically assessing the factors that enable learning in the face of policy conflict. Related Articles Butz, A. M., M. P. Fix, and J. L. Mitchell. 2015. “Policy Learning and the Diffusion of Stand‐Your‐Ground Laws.” Politics & Policy 43, no. 3: 347–377. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12116 . Anderson, D., L. A. Lawhon, J. Berggren, J. Huda, E. Koebele, and A. Kroepsch. 2017. “A Narrative Policy Framework Analysis of Wildfire Policy Discussions in Two Colorado Communities.” Politics & Policy 45, no. 4: 626–656. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12207 . Shanahan, E. A., M. K. McBeth, and P. L. Hathaway. 2011. “Narrative Policy Framework: The Influence of Media Policy Narratives on Public Opinion.” Politics & Policy 39: 373–400. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1747‐1346.2011.00295.x/abstract .

Politics &amp PolicyVol. 53(2)
University of Colorado Denver (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Policy Transfer and Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.