The Soft (Power) Side of the Belt and Road Initiative: Connecting Southeast Asia

China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) has been described in a variety of ways, such as a grand strategy or a geopolitical endeavor to (re)position China at the centre of the Eurasian landmass and beyond. It is undeniable that the initiative can also be understood as an ambitious connectivity masterplan, but of what type of connectivity? Although geoeconomic implications are often found in the literature, the soft (power) side of the BRI is generally downplayed. However, this paper argues that, whether deliberate or not, a soft-economic blend of strategies is increasingly evident and relatively successful. Connectivity developments across Southeast Asia, including but not limited to long-awaited railways, are a prime example of this unraveling phenomenon. By investigating the interaction between the multiple dimensions of connectivity – physical, digital, and sociocultural – it is possible to appreciate the complex dynamics of attraction and inducement arising from BRI-related efforts, and what it means for the future of the region and the initiative itself.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Hong Kong Review of Belt and Road Studies
Published
2024-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.63596/oborjournal.2.2024.18-32
Citations
1
Primary Topic
International Relations and Foreign Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.23
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Soft (Power) Side of the Belt and Road Initiative: Connecting Southeast Asia

Daniele Carminati
1 citations
Hong Kong Review of Belt and Road Studies
International Relations and Foreign Policy
2.23
article

The Soft (Power) Side of the Belt and Road Initiative: Connecting Southeast Asia

Daniele Carminati
article en
1 citations

Abstract

China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) has been described in a variety of ways, such as a grand strategy or a geopolitical endeavor to (re)position China at the centre of the Eurasian landmass and beyond. It is undeniable that the initiative can also be understood as an ambitious connectivity masterplan, but of what type of connectivity? Although geoeconomic implications are often found in the literature, the soft (power) side of the BRI is generally downplayed. However, this paper argues that, whether deliberate or not, a soft-economic blend of strategies is increasingly evident and relatively successful. Connectivity developments across Southeast Asia, including but not limited to long-awaited railways, are a prime example of this unraveling phenomenon. By investigating the interaction between the multiple dimensions of connectivity – physical, digital, and sociocultural – it is possible to appreciate the complex dynamics of attraction and inducement arising from BRI-related efforts, and what it means for the future of the region and the initiative itself.

Hong Kong Review of Belt and Road Studies(2)
Mahidol University (TH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
International Relations and Foreign Policy
2.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.