Common sowing rates of major European field crops: Results of a large‐scale farmer survey

Abstract In the European Union (EU), pesticides can only be used by farmers after an acceptable risk to consumers, operators, and the environment has been demonstrated. Plant protection products applied as seed treatments have several environmental advantages compared with foliar spray applications, especially lower use rates and less drift to off‐crop habitats. Regulatory risk assessments for seed treatment products in the EU are routinely based on maximum ‘commonly used’ sowing rates. Such assessments may overestimate the true risk as sowing rate distributions can be skewed by atypically high sowing rates, which are often a result of localized conditions. To have a better view of realistic worst‐case sowing rates for key field crops (cereals, maize, oilseed rape, sunflower, soybean and sugar beet) grown in the EU, a large‐scale farmer survey was conducted in 2020 and 2021 across a representative range of EU countries, and the United Kingdom. The total number of farmers interviewed ranged from 112 (spring oilseed rape) to 14 479 (winter wheat). The number of countries from which farmers were interviewed ranged from three (spring oilseed rape) to 17 (winter wheat). Mean and 90th percentile values of sowing rates were calculated from the survey results per crop and are proposed as more representative worst‐case values for use in seed treatment regulatory risk assessments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
EPPO Bulletin
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/epp.13078
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.90
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Common sowing rates of major European field crops: Results of a large‐scale farmer survey

Shahriar Kia, Bryan D. Midgley, Anna Kafka, Bruno Sornin et al.
1 citations
EPPO Bulletin
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
1.90
article

Common sowing rates of major European field crops: Results of a large‐scale farmer survey

Shahriar Kia, Bryan D. Midgley, Anna Kafka, Bruno Sornin, María Victoria Lacaze, Steven Kragten, Benjamin Dubois, Juan Ignacio Cirac Sasturáin, Leandro Maio, Alexander Mueller, Alain J. P. Alix, P. Ferraton
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract In the European Union (EU), pesticides can only be used by farmers after an acceptable risk to consumers, operators, and the environment has been demonstrated. Plant protection products applied as seed treatments have several environmental advantages compared with foliar spray applications, especially lower use rates and less drift to off‐crop habitats. Regulatory risk assessments for seed treatment products in the EU are routinely based on maximum ‘commonly used’ sowing rates. Such assessments may overestimate the true risk as sowing rate distributions can be skewed by atypically high sowing rates, which are often a result of localized conditions. To have a better view of realistic worst‐case sowing rates for key field crops (cereals, maize, oilseed rape, sunflower, soybean and sugar beet) grown in the EU, a large‐scale farmer survey was conducted in 2020 and 2021 across a representative range of EU countries, and the United Kingdom. The total number of farmers interviewed ranged from 112 (spring oilseed rape) to 14 479 (winter wheat). The number of countries from which farmers were interviewed ranged from three (spring oilseed rape) to 17 (winter wheat). Mean and 90th percentile values of sowing rates were calculated from the survey results per crop and are proposed as more representative worst‐case values for use in seed treatment regulatory risk assessments.

EPPO BulletinVol. 55(1)
Eurosense (Belgium) (BE), KWS Saat (Germany) (DE), Bayer (Germany) (DE), Syngenta (Switzerland) (CH), Limagrain (France) (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
1.90
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.