The Role of Glycemic Control in Inflammation Markers and Clinical Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes Patients with Severe COVID-19

<b>Background and Objectives:</b> Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) are at a heightened risk of adverse outcomes from Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, the influence of glycemic control on systemic inflammation and clinical severity remains incompletely understood. This study aimed to compare inflammatory markers, composite severity scores, and clinical outcomes between T2DM patients with COVID-19 who had well-controlled diabetes (hemoglobin A1c < 7%) versus those with poorly controlled diabetes (hemoglobin A1c ≥ 7%). <b>Methods:</b> We retrospectively reviewed 181 adult patients with T2DM and severe COVID-19 admitted to a tertiary hospital between January 2022 and December 2023. Patients were divided into two groups: well-controlled (<i>n</i> = 117) and poorly controlled (<i>n</i> = 64) T2DM. Baseline demographics, comorbidities, and laboratory parameters (C-reactive protein, interleukin-6, ferritin, neutrophil and lymphocyte counts, platelets, and calculated indices such as the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio [NLR] and systemic immune-inflammation index [SII]) were collected. Composite severity scores (APACHE II, CURB-65, and NEWS) and clinical outcomes (ICU admission, mechanical ventilation, mortality, and length of stay) were compared. Statistical tests used included Student's <i>t</i>-test or the Mann-Whitney U for continuous variables and chi-square for categorical variables, with <i>p</i> < 0.05 deemed significant. <b>Results:</b> The two groups did not differ significantly in age or duration of diabetes (<i>p</i> = 0.40 and <i>p</i> = 0.75, respectively). Patients with poorly controlled T2DM exhibited higher inflammatory markers (mean CRP of 93.4 mg/L vs. 78.6 mg/L, <i>p</i> = 0.002; IL-6 of 64.2 pg/mL vs. 52.8 pg/mL, <i>p</i> = 0.004) and elevated severity scores (APACHE II of 16.8 vs. 14.1, <i>p</i> = 0.001). Poor glycemic control was associated with higher ICU admissions (39.1% vs. 22.2%, <i>p</i> = 0.02) and mortality (14.1% vs. 6.0%, <i>p</i> = 0.05). <b>Conclusions:</b> In T2DM patients hospitalized with COVID-19, poor glycemic control correlates with heightened inflammatory responses, worse composite severity scores, and increased rates of unfavorable outcomes. These findings underscore the necessity of stringent glucose management to mitigate inflammation and improve prognoses in this vulnerable patient population.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biomedicines
Published
2025-04-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines13040886
Citations
3
Primary Topic
COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.19
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Role of Glycemic Control in Inflammation Markers and Clinical Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes Patients with Severe COVID-19

Ovidiu Roșca, Adrian Vlad, Oana Duicu, Flavia Ignuta et al.
3 citations
Biomedicines
COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
4.19
article

The Role of Glycemic Control in Inflammation Markers and Clinical Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes Patients with Severe COVID-19

Ovidiu Roșca, Adrian Vlad, Oana Duicu, Flavia Ignuta, Maliha Afra, L. R. Craciun, Dana Emilia Velimirovici, Uma Shailendri Rayudu
article en
3 citations

Abstract

<b>Background and Objectives:</b> Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) are at a heightened risk of adverse outcomes from Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, the influence of glycemic control on systemic inflammation and clinical severity remains incompletely understood. This study aimed to compare inflammatory markers, composite severity scores, and clinical outcomes between T2DM patients with COVID-19 who had well-controlled diabetes (hemoglobin A1c < 7%) versus those with poorly controlled diabetes (hemoglobin A1c ≥ 7%). <b>Methods:</b> We retrospectively reviewed 181 adult patients with T2DM and severe COVID-19 admitted to a tertiary hospital between January 2022 and December 2023. Patients were divided into two groups: well-controlled (<i>n</i> = 117) and poorly controlled (<i>n</i> = 64) T2DM. Baseline demographics, comorbidities, and laboratory parameters (C-reactive protein, interleukin-6, ferritin, neutrophil and lymphocyte counts, platelets, and calculated indices such as the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio [NLR] and systemic immune-inflammation index [SII]) were collected. Composite severity scores (APACHE II, CURB-65, and NEWS) and clinical outcomes (ICU admission, mechanical ventilation, mortality, and length of stay) were compared. Statistical tests used included Student's <i>t</i>-test or the Mann-Whitney U for continuous variables and chi-square for categorical variables, with <i>p</i> < 0.05 deemed significant. <b>Results:</b> The two groups did not differ significantly in age or duration of diabetes (<i>p</i> = 0.40 and <i>p</i> = 0.75, respectively). Patients with poorly controlled T2DM exhibited higher inflammatory markers (mean CRP of 93.4 mg/L vs. 78.6 mg/L, <i>p</i> = 0.002; IL-6 of 64.2 pg/mL vs. 52.8 pg/mL, <i>p</i> = 0.004) and elevated severity scores (APACHE II of 16.8 vs. 14.1, <i>p</i> = 0.001). Poor glycemic control was associated with higher ICU admissions (39.1% vs. 22.2%, <i>p</i> = 0.02) and mortality (14.1% vs. 6.0%, <i>p</i> = 0.05). <b>Conclusions:</b> In T2DM patients hospitalized with COVID-19, poor glycemic control correlates with heightened inflammatory responses, worse composite severity scores, and increased rates of unfavorable outcomes. These findings underscore the necessity of stringent glucose management to mitigate inflammation and improve prognoses in this vulnerable patient population.

BiomedicinesVol. 13(4)
Deccan College of Medical Sciences (IN), Victor Babeș University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timișoara (RO), Institute of Medical Sciences (IN), GITAM University (IN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
4.19
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.