Determinants of Patients’ Perception of Primary Healthcare Quality: Empirical Analysis in the Brazilian Health System

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Primary healthcare (PHC) plays a central role in the promotion of universal healthcare coverage within the Brazilian health system. Nevertheless, inequalities across municipalities represent substantial barriers to achieving equity in access to health, particularly due to disparities in the quality of healthcare delivered to patients. Thus, the study aimed to investigate factors associated with perception of PHC quality among adult individuals using private and public facilities within the Brazilian health system. <b>Methods</b>: The empirical approach was based on quantitative analysis of cross-sectional data from five nationally representative surveys conducted by the Brazilian Institute for Geography and Statistics (Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística, IBGE) in 1998, 2003, 2008, 2013, and 2019. Pairwise comparisons and marginal analyses allowed for the assessment of differences in patients' perception of healthcare quality according to source of funding and type of healthcare quality. A logistic regression model was estimated to identify factors associated with the perception of good quality of care. Model discrimination, calibration, and goodness-of-fit were assessed to ensure the robustness of analyses. <b>Results</b>: The results indicate that patients' satisfaction was positively associated with level of implementation of the national program based on payment for performance in public healthcare facilities, PMAQ-AB (OR = 3.376; <i>p</i> < 0.001), self-assessment of good health status (OR = 3.209; <i>p</i> < 0.001), and healthcare financed through health insurance (OR = 2.344; <i>p</i> < 0.001). Contrarily, receiving healthcare in a public facility (OR = 0.358; <i>p</i> < 0.001) was negatively associated with the evaluation of good quality. <b>Conclusions</b>: The findings showed that patients' perception of quality of care presents significant associations with patients' health characteristics, healthcare funding source, and implementation of the PMAQ-AB. Furthermore, patients generally perceived lower healthcare quality in public facilities. The study indicates the need for evidence-based decision-making in public policies of health, particularly regarding further advances in payment for performance programs designed to foster improvements in quality of care within public PHC facilities in Brazil.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Healthcare
Published
2025-04-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13080857
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.82

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Determinants of Patients’ Perception of Primary Healthcare Quality: Empirical Analysis in the Brazilian Health System

Althea La Foucade, Flávia Mori Sarti, Bárbara Luíza Souza Freitas, Roxanne Martin et al.
1 citations
Healthcare
Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare
2.82
article

Determinants of Patients’ Perception of Primary Healthcare Quality: Empirical Analysis in the Brazilian Health System

Althea La Foucade, Flávia Mori Sarti, Bárbara Luíza Souza Freitas, Roxanne Martin, Maria Luisa de Oliveira Collino Antiga
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Primary healthcare (PHC) plays a central role in the promotion of universal healthcare coverage within the Brazilian health system. Nevertheless, inequalities across municipalities represent substantial barriers to achieving equity in access to health, particularly due to disparities in the quality of healthcare delivered to patients. Thus, the study aimed to investigate factors associated with perception of PHC quality among adult individuals using private and public facilities within the Brazilian health system. <b>Methods</b>: The empirical approach was based on quantitative analysis of cross-sectional data from five nationally representative surveys conducted by the Brazilian Institute for Geography and Statistics (Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística, IBGE) in 1998, 2003, 2008, 2013, and 2019. Pairwise comparisons and marginal analyses allowed for the assessment of differences in patients' perception of healthcare quality according to source of funding and type of healthcare quality. A logistic regression model was estimated to identify factors associated with the perception of good quality of care. Model discrimination, calibration, and goodness-of-fit were assessed to ensure the robustness of analyses. <b>Results</b>: The results indicate that patients' satisfaction was positively associated with level of implementation of the national program based on payment for performance in public healthcare facilities, PMAQ-AB (OR = 3.376; <i>p</i> < 0.001), self-assessment of good health status (OR = 3.209; <i>p</i> < 0.001), and healthcare financed through health insurance (OR = 2.344; <i>p</i> < 0.001). Contrarily, receiving healthcare in a public facility (OR = 0.358; <i>p</i> < 0.001) was negatively associated with the evaluation of good quality. <b>Conclusions</b>: The findings showed that patients' perception of quality of care presents significant associations with patients' health characteristics, healthcare funding source, and implementation of the PMAQ-AB. Furthermore, patients generally perceived lower healthcare quality in public facilities. The study indicates the need for evidence-based decision-making in public policies of health, particularly regarding further advances in payment for performance programs designed to foster improvements in quality of care within public PHC facilities in Brazil.

HealthcareVol. 13(8)
Universidade de São Paulo (BR), University of the West Indies (TT)
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare
2.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.